Follow by Email

Friday, March 09, 2012

THE NEWSEUM - AKA ANOTHER 9/11 MEMORIAL and or the TOMB of TIM RUSSERT

English: Front pages of newspapers, displayed ...Image via Wikipedia


THE NEWSEUM
 
    We  went down to DC this week to check out the much heralded NEWSEUM ( among other things)  near the Capitol  mall. We spent 5 hrs. visiting the place after paying  $ 25 bucks each to get in. Who said we have a Free Press? Like the old saying goes, yea its free if if you can afford to own one. Needless to say, I wasn't at all impressed. The whole place is a very well decked out ( expense) piece of CORP. propaganda masquerading as a shrine to FREEDUMB. I was particularly annoyed by the central casting 9/11 and the various huge pieces of twisted debris they have as monuments to this event was given there.  They dedicate almost an entire floor of the 6 story structure to 9/11, as if it is the central event of  all human media history. Look, as bad as 9/11 was honestly  if you want REAL tragedy don't waste your time in this place, just head down the Mall to the Holocaust museum. The other really annoying display in this place is the shrink wrapped Office of Tim Russert the right wing hack journalist that died suddenly in  June 2008. Good riddance, I couldn't stand Russert, he was an arrogant windbag. It's obvious this whole place was designed by the same team of Corp. shills that have also given us the American Enterprise Institute , the Hoover Institute and the CATO Institute , all Corp. funded Non-Think tanks. To top off your visit,  just so you don't miss the POINT, that 'MERICA has a FREE PRESS  they have a huge interactive map of the World's nations divided in three categories Green colored coded for FREE PRESS, Yellow for Partially FREE ( whatever that means?) and RED for not free. Interestingly, Mexico was RED because if the drug lords don't like you your DEAD. The US not surprisingly was GREEN. Green in the case of the US though means the Press is owned by a few Billionaires and that by their definition means its  Free.
   If your going to DC any time soon, my suggestion is your not missing anything by taking a pass on this monument to the CORP. owned so called free Press in America and the west ( except for Mexico.)  Your better off spending your time checking out the dozens of actually FREE museums and exhibits that dot the landscape down there.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Monday, March 05, 2012

PUNK ECONOMICS 1 & 2

PUNK ECON. LESSON 1

PUNK ECON. LESSON 2

Some well done and fun econ. lessons. Spend a few mins. watching these, some of you might actually learn something, especially my neo-liberal econ. Prof, neo-con lawyer. and gold bug friends on the right. 

Sunday, March 04, 2012

AC Press "Special Feature on 62' Storm"


    The "special 50 yr. Anniversary feature" in the AC Press http://www.pressofatlanticcity.com/features/f6/state-sought-to-line-shore-with-protective-dunes-following-the/article_d669ce96-6404-11e1-bf65-001871e3ce6c.html this weekend is a story some of us lived through 50 yrs. ago and still remember vividly. The sad part of this feature is that the author allows the same old cast of extremely self-interested characters to tell most of the story to us. Author Sarah Watson turned to the same same cast of characters that brought us the ill-fated AISPP that has destroyed AC's beaches and boardwalk this last decade and led to the rapid decline, some would even say abandonment of AC as a premiere coastal resort. Nowhere in this  set of stories is anyone but Stockton Prof. Stuart Farrell, Lawyer and "Treasure Hunter" Scott Abbott, The Army Corp. /NJDEP and Stevens Institute ( we build groins , jetties etc.) telling this  OHHH so scary tale.  I particularly liked Scott Abbott's dramatic story telling about how the WHOLE Ventnor boardwalk fell down. Of course it's not true. Part of it, the same part STUPIDLY rebuilt in the middle of the beach from Derby ave. to Margate in 1964 is the section that fell down. ( I witnessed it doing just that.)  The part from Ventnor Pier north was hardly damaged. The whole thing was eventually torn down and rebuilt by ex-Mayor Timmay Kreischer's dad who was the Mayor of Ventnor back then.

FARRELL and his "AXE to grind" with Margate

   Today, we have Prof.Stuart Farrell whining in one feature how those terrible rich people in Margate and Longport didn't go along with his advice and now face, OH my GOD, the wrath of STUART!  Of course this band of merry business men ( The Army Corp and related business pals)  are still moaning over not being able to wreck Margate and Longport's beaches as well with their 20 ft. high weed choked pile of sand called the AISPP. Oh and for the assertion always made by Farrell that we didn't join because WE knew the Ocean current would bring much of the sand to us anyway, ( his way of saying were stealing it) so what!  The truth is Stuart, we the taxpayers in Margate paid for 90%+ of that sand ( since the Project is paid through Federal and State tax $$) as well as your bloated salary and benefits PROFESSOR, so stop whining about it already!

62' 91' & 92'

   So why didn't even worse storms @ Halloween 1991 (The Perfect Storm) and the huge high tides ( even higher then 91 and 62' of the Xmas 1992 storm) destroy us again as in 1962? No dunes were on any of our beaches in 1991. Because after the 62' disaster the Corp. was tasked to build an Island long set of high wooden bulkheads that exist to this day almost 50 yrs. later. Its these bulkheads, not any  dunes that saved us from major storm damage. You'll never hear that story though from Farrell or Abbott or the rest of these people NEVER! Today no Project dune exists on the southern half of Absecon Island and we've had dozens of major storms and hurricanes in the last decade, with NO damage beyond some minor street end flooding and bay area flooding. The really destructive after effect of these storms is sitting on our beaches today directly in front of the boardwalk from Derby ave. in Ventnor to New Hampshire Ave in AC. The so called Protective dune built by the NJDEP/ArmyCorp. a dune ( actually a levee) that NEVER existed on Absecon Islands beachfront in the last 150 yrs. This monstrous pile of crap has effectively destroyed the AC economy by blocking the absolutely necessary Ocean view and Sea breeze from the boardwalk. 

Friday, March 02, 2012

SCIENCE FRI: - OCEAN ACIDIFICATION - HAPPENING FASTER THEN IN THE PAST!!

Ocean Acidification Rate May Be Unprecedented, Study Says

ScienceDaily (Mar. 1, 2012) — The world's oceans may be turning acidic faster today from human carbon emissions than they did during four major extinctions in the last 300 million years, when natural pulses of carbon sent global temperatures soaring, says a new study in Science. The study is the first of its kind to survey the geologic record for evidence of ocean acidification over this vast time period.
"What we're doing today really stands out," said lead author Bärbel Hönisch, a paleoceanographer at Columbia University's Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory. "We know that life during past ocean acidification events was not wiped out -- new species evolved to replace those that died off. But if industrial carbon emissions continue at the current pace, we may lose organisms we care about -- coral reefs, oysters, salmon."
The oceans act like a sponge to draw down excess carbon dioxide from the air; the gas reacts with seawater to form carbonic acid, which over time is neutralized by fossil carbonate shells on the seafloor. But if CO2 goes into the oceans too quickly, it can deplete the carbonate ions that corals, mollusks and some plankton need for reef and shell-building.
That is what is happening now. In a review of hundreds of paleoceanographic studies, a team of researchers from five countries found evidence for only one period in the last 300 million years when the oceans changed even remotely as fast as today: the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum, or PETM, some 56 million years ago. In the early 1990s, scientists extracting sediments from the seafloor off Antarctica found a layer of mud from this period wedged between thick deposits of white plankton fossils. In a span of about 5,000 years, they estimated, a mysterious surge of carbon doubled atmospheric concentrations, pushed average global temperatures up by about6 degrees C, and dramatically changed the ecological landscape.
The result: carbonate plankton shells littering the seafloor dissolved, leaving the brown layer of mud. As many as half of all species of benthic foraminifers, a group of single-celled organisms that live at the ocean bottom, went extinct, suggesting that organisms higher in the food chain may have also disappeared, said study co-author Ellen Thomas, a paleoceanographer at Yale University who was on that pivotal Antarctic cruise. "It's really unusual that you lose more than 5 to 10 percent of species over less than 20,000 years," she said. "It's usually on the order of a few percent over a million years." During this time, scientists estimate, ocean pH -- a measure of acidity--may have fallen as much as 0.45 units. (As pH falls, acidity rises.)
In the last hundred years, atmospheric CO2 has risen about 30 percent, to 393 parts per million, and ocean pH has fallen by 0.1 unit, to 8.1--an acidification rate at least 10 times faster than 56 million years ago, says Hönisch. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change predicts that pH may fall another 0.3 units by the end of the century,to 7.8, raising the possibility that we may soon see ocean changes similar to those observed during the PETM.
More catastrophic events have shaken earth before, but perhaps not as quickly. The study finds two other times of potential ocean acidification: the extinctions triggered by massive volcanism at the end of the Permian and Triassic eras, about 252 million and 201 million years ago respectively. But the authors caution that the timing and chemical changes of these events is less certain. Because most ocean sediments older than 180 million years have been recycled back into the deep earth, scientists have fewer records to work with.
During the end of the Permian, about 252 million years ago, massive volcanic eruptions in present-day Russia led to a rise in atmospheric carbon, and the extinction of 96 percent of marine life. Scientists have found evidence for ocean dead zones and the survival of organisms able to withstand carbonate-poor seawater and high blood-carbon levels, but so far they have been unable to reconstruct changes in ocean pH or carbonate.
At the end of the Triassic, about 201 million years ago, a second burst of mass volcanism doubled atmospheric carbon. Coral reefs collapsed and many sea creatures vanished. Noting that tropical species fared the worst, some scientists question if global warming rather than ocean acidification was the main killer at this time.
The effects of ocean acidification today are overshadowed for now by other problems, ranging from sewage pollution and hotter summer temperatures that threaten corals with disease and bleaching. However, scientists trying to isolate the effects of acidic water in the lab have shown that lower pH levels can harm a range of marine life, from reef and shell-building organisms to the tiny snails favored by salmon. In a recent study, scientists from Stony Brook University found that the larvae of bay scallops and hard clams grow best at pre-industrial pH levels, while their shells corrode at the levels projected for 2100. Off the U.S. Pacific Northwest, the death of oyster larvae has recently been linked to the upwelling of acidic water there.
In parts of the ocean acidified by underwater volcanoes venting carbon dioxide, scientists have seen alarming signs of what the oceans could be like by 2100. In a 2011 study of coral reefs off Papua New Guinea, scientists writing in the journal Nature Climate Change found that when pH dropped to 7.8, reef diversity declined by as much as 40 percent. Other studies have found that clownfish larvae raised in the lab lose their ability to sniff out predators and find their way home when pH drops below 7.8.
"It's not a problem that can be quickly reversed," said Christopher Langdon, a biological oceanographer at the University of Miami who co-authored the study on Papua New Guinea reefs. "Once a species goes extinct it's gone forever. We're playing a very dangerous game."
It may take decades before ocean acidification's effect on marine life shows itself. Until then, the past is a good way to foresee the future, says Richard Feely, an oceanographer at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration who was not involved in the study. "These studies give you a sense of the timing involved in past ocean acidification events -- they did not happen quickly," he said. "The decisions we make over the next few decades could have significant implications on a geologic timescale."
The study was funded by the U.S. National Science Foundation.

VENTNOR - INCUMBENTS TO RUN FOR REELECTION!!

   Hot off the presses as they say,  Vhttp://www.pressofatlanticcity.com/communities/margate_ventnor_longport/ventnor-commission-incumbents-will-battle-full-slate-of-challengers/article_ee141f14-63f6-11e1-9962-001871e3ce6c.htmlentnor's Incumbent Commission headed by Mayor Theresa Kelly is running for reelection against a full slate of challengers, headed by "Albie" Battaglia a local Ventnor school teacher. It's rumored that Mr. Battaglia
's team is being backed by ex.Mayor Tim Kreischer and that Kreischer hopes to gain a job with the Battaglia team if they get elected. As is common knowledge, Tim is only a few yrs. away from getting a nice big fat pension from Ventnor's taxpayers if he can land another "Public" position. IMO, the Kelly team has done a great job of righting the ship in Ventnor after the decades long tyrannical rule of tiny Mayor Timmay and his side kick,  now Margate City Atty. John Scott Abbott.( appointed.)

GOOD SENSE

One can only hope that Ventnor's voters have the " good sense" to know when they have a winning hand down at city hall.  I haven't always agreed with everything the present team has done, but I can tell you this, Mayor Kelly and John Piatt have almost completely turned Ventnor around these last four yrs. For one thing Mayor Kelly is a "real" leader unlike the tinpot two bit dictator Ventnor had to endure for over a decade when Kreischer was Mayor.

Thursday, March 01, 2012

MARGATE HALTS THE USE OF TRASHED XMAS TREES TO STABILIZE DUNES

Beach grass, dunes, the sea.Image via Wikipedia

 

    In a story in the Downbeach Current today, http://www.shorenewstoday.com/snt/news/index.php/downbeach-/longport-margate-ventnor-general-news/21693-margate-scraps-dune-stabilization-project.html   Margate announced it would no longer be allowing the use of  trashed XMAS trees to be placed on the beach, as the cores of  any newly man made dune structures.
   Contrary to popular belief  placing dead Xmas trees ( or any other inert material)  into dunes doesn't stabilize them. All it does is place trash on the beach and when these artificial dunes wash away the trees or what's left of them become wind borne and water borne debris , that then has to be dealt with by property owners or the City. The city will still allow programs to plant sea grass on Margate's existing dunes however. Actually, also contrary to popular belief planting sea grass on top of these artificial dunes doesn't do much more to stabilize them then the Xmas trees did. They do hold the surface sand somewhat, but in a naturally created dune the sea grasses grow up through the dune as it grows around and on top of them. Sea grass planting projects used today are actually just man made sea grass lawns that have to be fertilized just like your lawn because artifically created dunes, especially ones made from replenished beach sand won't sustain sea grass very well. This is because the sand grain size on them is wrong. Margate's dunes however are somewhat unique as they are not made from  replenished sand  like the dunes in Ventnor and AC are and therefore are better candidates for hosting artificially planted varieties of sea grass. Nevertheless, they are still merely lawns and do little to actually stabilize the dune under them.
    The article  wrongly says  at its end that Margate's present dunes are "natural." They aren't at all natural , having been placed  on the beach as part of a general city wide man made ( bulldozer constructed) dune building project that was done after the  1991 Halloween Nor'Easter and the XMas 1992 Nor'easters, both of which were record 100 yr. storms. The dunes that exist today on a few of Margate's beaches are what remains of that Project. They have nothing to do with the AISPP built dunes that exist on the beaches north of Margate in Ventnor and Atlantic City.
 
Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, February 29, 2012

FIRE!!





Published on Monday, February 27, 2012 by Common Dreams

There Will Be Fire: The 'Carbon Bomb' 'Waiting to Be Ignited'

Scientist: With climate change fires will become more frequent, more intense and harder to stop.

- Common Dreams staff
“We are going to see more fire in (the) future, that’s the bottom line.” “A warmer world’s going to see more fire.”
This eery warning comes from Mike Flannigan, a senior research scientist with Natural Resources Canada and professor at the University of Alberta, at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. He says that fires will become more frequent, more intense and harder to stop.photo: John McColgan of the Alaskan Type I Incident Management Team (Bureau of Land Management, Alaska Fire Service)
Flannigan's "conservative estimate" states there would be two to three times more fire activity in the northern hemisphere by the end of the century.
“If a fire is intense, aerial suppression is no longer effective, so even modern fire management agencies, like Canada, the United States and Australia — among the best in the world — will be extremely challenged,” he said.
“I would argue that the standard way of doing fire management will no longer be effective in the future. And that doesn’t even begin to address many parts of the globe where they have traditional fire-suppression approaches, which will be completely overwhelmed."
“So the risk to life and infrastructure is only going to increase under climate change.”
Flannigan added that peat fires are also expected to dramatically raise greenhouse gas emissions, Postmedia News reports:
If more wildfires were not bad enough, Flannigan said the warming climate means peat lands, which contain vast stores of carbon, are also more likely to ignite and release greenhouse gas emissions. The emissions could in turn “feed” more warming and more fire.
A 1997 fire in Indonesia ignited peat lands that smouldered for months. By the time it was over, Flannigan said the peat fire had released greenhouse gases equal to 20 to 40 per cent of the total worldwide emissions that year from fossil fuels.
Peat fires in the boreal could have the potential to release far more greenhouse gases. “Our peat reserves in Canada, Russia and Alaska dwarf anything in Indonesia,” he said in an interview.
Inter Press Service reports that one researcher referred to the northern forest as a “carbon bomb” "waiting to be ignited:"
When the increased fire from global warming was first detected in 2006, Johann Goldammer of the Global Fire Monitoring Center at Germany’s Freiburg University called the northern forest a “carbon bomb”.
“It’s sitting there waiting to be ignited, and there is already ignition going on,” Goldammer said according to media reports in 2006.
Inter Press Service continues:
About half the world’s soil carbon is locked in northern permafrost and peatland soils, said Merritt Turetsky, an ecologist at Canada’s University of Guelph. This carbon has been accumulating for thousands of years, but fires can release much of this into the atmosphere rapidly, Turetsky said in a release.
Over the past 10 years, fires are burning far more boreal forest than ever before. Longer snow-free seasons, melting permafrost and rising temperatures are large-scale changes underway in the north, Turetsky and colleagues have found.
Other researchers have shown that the average size of forest fires in the boreal zone of western Canada has tripled since the 1980s. Much of Canada’s vast forest region is approaching a tipping point, warned researchers at the Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Germany’s largest research organisation.
This “drastic change” in normal fire pattern has occurred with a only a small increase in temperatures relative to future temperatures, the German researchers concluded in a study published in the December 2011 issue of The American Naturalist.

Monday, February 27, 2012

Social Security vs. The Affordable Care Act

Alan Fucking Simpson! plus: Social Security versus the Affordable Care Act: comparing apples and a mouthful of tacks

by Weldon Berger | February 26, 2012 - 5:50pm



Alan Fucking Simpson! is a former Senator from Wyoming. He hates Social Security and the "greedy geezers" who rely on it to sustain them in their later years, and he doesn't understand why anybody who already gets Social Security cares about preserving the program for younger people when anyone can see that it's none of their business. He is the co-chair of the current president's completely gratuitous National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform, a name that translates to "the National Commission on Cannibalizing Social Insurance and Safety Net Programs."
President Obama created the bipartisan commission when Congress, in an uncharacteristically sensible move involving some characteristically skeezy motives, decided not to. The prospective Congressional commission prefigured the late, unlamented Super Committee, which was designed to do the same thing—produce a list of proposals that Congress would either approve without amendment or disapprove. The president supported the plan, but most Senate Democrats opposed it and it went down when several Republicans who cosponsored the legislation voted against it on the grounds that the commission might somehow do something that could possibly redound to Obama's benefit.
Good for them. Unfortunately, the president then appointed his own commission, but without the legislative imperative. He named Erskine Bowles, a conservative Democrat and wealthy investment banker, to represent liberals and the poor, and to hold down the cannibals' corner he appointed the aforementioned cannibalistic Republican Alan Fucking Simpson!
Had the commission managed to agree on a set of proposals, the president would have submitted them to Congress accompanied by a demand for an up or down vote, at which Congress would have snickered before they embalmed the thing with the Congressional embalming fluid recipe of spittle and bile and secret sauce. Fortunately, the commission members were unable to agree on a menu of horrible stuff in sufficient numbers to make it official, so Bowles and Alan Fucking Simpson! negotiated their own menu of (mostly) horrible stuff and the president has more or less pretended since that the Bowles-Alan Fucking Simpson! proposals were the whole commission's.
Why did the president unnecessarily create a commission that was guaranteed to recommend serious hurt to social insurance and safety net programs because it was co-chaired by JP Morgan on the left and on the right by Alan Fucking Simpson!? Who knows? I tend toward the theory that the president wants to inflict serious hurt upon social insurance and safety net programs and is anxious for bipartisan cover to do so. Others think he's just being sarcastic, or Socratic, or something.
The president's 2013 budget includes some of the JP Morgan-Alan Fucking Simpson! proposals, although not the most bilious of them because it's an election year. It also includes some modestly good stuff, which is good news. The bad news is that the modestly good stuff and the bad stuff represent the president's opening bids, which means the bad stuff will get worse and the good stuff will get less good or simply vanish altogether as negotiations proceed.
The other good news is that Congressional Republicans will once again refuse to pass anything that might conceivably be perceived by anyone as a Presidential accomplishment, which means that although none of the good stuff will get passed, with any luck none of the really bad stuff will get passed either and it'll be continuing resolutions all around at least until November 7.
The other bad news is that regardless the outcome of the election, president Obama will have no reason to maintain his current faux-populist stance. If he wins, he can get back to negotiating the demise of our social insurance and safety net programs with Alan Fucking Simpson! or his designated representatives. If he loses, Republicans (many of whom actually pretty much hate Alan Fucking Simpson! because he isn't homophobic or afraid of vaginas, or afraid of Republicans who hate him) can get back to their own peculiar, vengeful pursuits.
Either way, Alan Fucking Simpson! is if not the, than at least a bellwether of our times.
Meanwhile: in my travels, I've seen not a few people comparing the evolution of Social Security with what these people fantasize will be the evolution of the Affordable Care Act. "Social Security," they say, "initially excluded a lot of people but was gradually amended into the inclusive program that it is today. The same thing will happen with the Affordable Care Act, which will be gradually improved until it covers everyone."
This would be a useful comparison if Social Security had begun as a scheme that forced people to give their money to private firms to invest for retirement, and had then morphed into the government-administrated social pension insurance program that it is today.
But of course that's not what happened. Social Security began life as a government-administered social insurance program that guarantees a retirement income, and over time it became a better government-administered social insurance program. The Affordable Care Act began life as a government-mandated scheme to force payments to private insurance companies that agreed to more strict government regulation (which they're gaming as we speak) in exchange for the guaranteed business.
There's no reason at all to expect that program to develop into anything resembling a sensible universal care system, and there's certainly no point of comparison with the evolution of Social Security. They don't share a common ancestor. The ACA is an evolutionary dead end.
_______


ABOUT AUTHORWhatever you see from me here at the Chimp has likely been cross-posted at my blog, BTC News, where I've been holding forth more or less regularly since 2003. I am the first and will probably remain the only homeless person ever to field a White House correspondent. I'm no longer homeless and no longer fielding a White House correspondent. Coincidence? You be the judge.