Follow by Email

Sunday, May 31, 2009

THE COST CONUNDRUM


  @ the title link is probably one of the best articles on our building Health-care crisis I've read yet.  What I found so interesting about it was how it examines the way medicine is being practiced in many different regions of the country and compares these different medical cultures and cost. The conclusions are real eye openers.  What become immediately obvious is that no matter how we as a country decide to handle the billing end of health care , whether through a mostly private system of health Ins. companies , as it is today, or through a public system ( like Medicare) , neither is going to work if medicine goes the way of some of the examples this article so eloquently details for us.    I would honestly say that for anyone really interested in this debate, this article is a must read. 

Saturday, May 30, 2009

BEACH BANTER


REGIONAL News

The Big local news of the week was Memorial Day weekend. Never did get any consensus on how good or bad it was business wise? It didn't seem very crowded Downbeach and reports were although they (the shoobies) came down they didn't spend like in the past. Of course if it was really bad The AC Press ( Pravda) would never tell us the truth.

Ventnor

   Ventnor is still looking for the AISPP contract that Tim and the boyz were suppose to sign back in 2003 and it appears didn't. We won't know definitely what happened till the NJDEP and the Army chime in. So far no word from Tim, Scott and the rest of them. My feeling is contracts mean little to these people. They're only important when they say they are , other wise they don't count.
The northern ex-redev. area is now being called by many "North Beach".  I guess it's as good a name as any. 


Margate

Margate 's school board gave approval for a third Principal, even though the school population shrinks every year and everyone knows there is no need for three separate campuses anymore. It's gotten so bad that Margate now has to import students and pay for them just so the school admin. can justify the present set up with the State. I'd bet if you came back to Margate in 20 yrs. their would be four schools and four principals by then, and students being imported from eastern Europe. It's a business!

Longport

In Longport the on going feud between Mr. Boyle and the city enters it's third yr., with nobody yet being able to fugure out why? I hope he runs the plane banner again this summer they're getting to be a fixture, along with the Horizon blimp.

A.C.

In A.C. Mayor Langford is running again and this time he's promising LOL tax relief for the two remaining taxpayers. Oh and he has a secret plan for Bader field. ( we're all waiting breathlessly for this one) In other pre-election news Craig Callaway is still providing hundreds of messenger ballots again, he's doing this  from prison ( never an impediment to really able AC politicians).

Wednesday, May 27, 2009

WASHED OUT TO SEA

Although, I'm not thrilled with the total report , it does make some good pts and I love the cover. The conclusion that somehow we should take the beach replenishment  $$ and waste it on river levees, to essentially do the same thing,  is as laughable, as it is hypocritical, ( considering the author Tom Coburn (R) no surprise here.)  It's still worth a read.

Tuesday, May 26, 2009

HAS VENTNOR EVER OFFICIALLY JOINED THE AISPP?

PART OF THE AISPP BEING DEMOLISHED IN MAY 20o4

It has come to my attention over the last few days that  Ventnor under the Kreischer administration might have never officially signed ( the famous 50 yr. contract) joining the AISPP back in 2002/2003 . This was  after the special election called for  held and won by the Kreischer regime back in Nov. 2002. As of today, after a  search for a signed copy of the AISPP contract,  Ventnor's present administration hasn't been able to locate the cities copy. The NJDEP and the A.CO.E are being petitioned to look for their copies. If neither of these agencies can locate a copy, an interesting legal situation may exist.

HELLO TIM & SCOTT!

Since it appears no communication exists between the old and new Ventnor admins. I'd like to make an open appeal to any members of the last Ventnor admin. to please call city hall and help them locate this important document. Or, if they never actually signed the contract to please tell the rest of us , why?


WHAT DOES THIS MEAN?

To be honest, I'm not even sure if it was necessary for Ventnor to sign the contract? Maybe, Atlantic City signed for Ventnor? It's a mystery that only the NJDEP , the Kreischer  admin. or the A.C.O.E. can clear up. Howabout it boys, if it's not a big deal please come forward and let the rest of us know what really happened ?   

Sunday, May 24, 2009

MEMORIAL DAY WEEKEND- NEVER FORGET!

TARAWA RED BEACH 1943

This was one of  the pictures that shocked America 66 yrs. ago and brought home the terrible price that was going to be paid for defeating Japan in the Pacific. Lest we never forget the price of our liberty , we should always remember, it's paid for periodically with  the blood of young patriots like these.  To our troops today in Iraq and Afghanistan I wish you all well and that you are all home soon. 

THE DEBATE IS ON:

The Chelsea Hotel in AC

The debate is on! Is A.C.'s future only for the BIG Corps. that dominate it at present?  State Sen. and Ex. AC Mayor Whelan has proposed a radical restructuring of the existing State Casino Gaming laws to allow for mini-Casinos in AC in hotels and motels with 200 rooms or more. Right now the bottom limit is 500 rooms.  Of course, I've been talking about the disease of BIGNESS that has swallowed America over these last 30 yrs for quite some time. It seems AC is now in the terminal phase of this malady and it's to Sen. Whelan's credit that he's listening to the advice he's getting about this issue. Of course we can surmise from the picture of the Chelsea Hotel in AC that probably some of it is extremely self-serving and coming from the owners of The Chelsea.  How would you like to have bought and renovated an old non-casino Hotel in A.C. the yr. before the collapse of the economy locally? That's the predicament Mr. Bashshaw et al. find themselves today, sitting on a huge debt some say is over $ 150 mil., with very few customers.  Whatever, Mr. Bashshaw's situation and others like the Marriot Corp. (that did the same bad move.) The idea of lowering the limit and opening up the town to smaller developers is a good one, that is 31 yrs. over due.

CASINO ASSOCIATION 

Of course the existing Casinos are dead set against any change that would hurt their already weakening bottom lines. Whose surprised, these BIG CORPS. hate competition. For all their CEO's lectures about how free enterprise made America great, the truth is they all hate it. Atlantic City's political leadership though has a bigger responsibility to the area and it's citizens then to protect and placate one small group of Casino Industry insiders. I think Whelan realizes this. I also think he truly believes as I do that the era of the Mega -Casino locally is over.  You move on and try something else. Even Whelan sees that 30 yrs. of BIG Casinos hasn't done much to remove the blight it was supposedly brought here to deal with. To the contrary it's made it far worse.

Saturday, May 23, 2009

BLUE DOUBLE CROSS


Blue Double Cross

by Paul Krugman

That didn’t take long. Less than two weeks have passed since much of the medical-industrial complex made a big show of working with President Obama on health care reform — and the double-crossing is already well under way. Indeed, it’s now clear that even as they met with the president, pretending to be cooperative, insurers were gearing up to play the same destructive role they did the last time health reform was on the agenda.

So here’s the question: Will Mr. Obama gloss over the reality of what’s happening, and try to preserve the appearance of cooperation? Or will he honor his own pledge, made back during the campaign, to go on the offensive against special interests if they stand in the way of reform?

The story so far: on May 11 the White House called a news conference to announce that major players in health care, including the American Hospital Association and the lobbying group America’s Health Insurance Plans, had come together to support a national effort to control health care costs.

The fact sheet on the meeting, one has to say, was classic Obama in its message of post-partisanship and, um, hope. “For too long, politics and point-scoring have prevented our country from tackling this growing crisis,” it said, adding, “The American people are eager to put the old Washington ways behind them.”

But just three days later the hospital association insisted that it had not, in fact, promised what the president said it had promised — that it had made no commitment to the administration’s goal of reducing the rate at which health care costs are rising by 1.5 percentage points a year. And the head of the insurance lobby said that the idea was merely to “ramp up” savings, whatever that means.

Meanwhile, the insurance industry is busily lobbying Congress to block one crucial element of health care reform, the public option — that is, offering Americans the right to buy insurance directly from the government as well as from private insurance companies. And at least some insurers are gearing up for a major smear campaign.

On Monday, just a week after the White House photo-op, The Washington Post reported that Blue Cross Blue Shield of North Carolina was preparing to run a series of ads attacking the public option. The planning for this ad campaign must have begun quite some time ago.

The Post has the storyboards for the ads, and they read just like the infamous Harry and Louise ads that helped kill health care reform in 1993. Troubled Americans are shown being denied their choice of doctor, or forced to wait months for appointments, by faceless government bureaucrats. It’s a scary image that might make some sense if private health insurance — which these days comes primarily via HMOs — offered all of us free choice of doctors, with no wait for medical procedures. But my health plan isn’t like that. Is yours?

“We can do a lot better than a government-run health care system,” says a voice-over in one of the ads. To which the obvious response is, if that’s true, why don’t you? Why deny Americans the chance to reject government insurance if it’s really that bad?

For none of the reform proposals currently on the table would force people into a government-run insurance plan. At most they would offer Americans the choice of buying into such a plan.

And the goal of the insurers is to deny Americans that choice. They fear that many people would prefer a government plan to dealing with private insurance companies that, in the real world as opposed to the world of their ads, are more bureaucratic than any government agency, routinely deny clients their choice of doctor, and often refuse to pay for care.

Which brings us back to Mr. Obama.

Back during the Democratic primary campaign, Mr. Obama argued that the Clintons had failed in their 1993 attempt to reform health care because they had been insufficiently inclusive. He promised instead to gather all the stakeholders, including the insurance companies, around a “big table.” And that May 11 event was, of course, intended precisely to show this big-table strategy in action.

But what if interest groups showed up at the big table, then blocked reform? Back then, Mr. Obama assured voters that he would get tough: “If those insurance companies and drug companies start trying to run ads with Harry and Louise, I’ll run my own ads as president. I’ll get on television and say ‘Harry and Louise are lying.’ ”

The question now is whether he really meant it.

The medical-industrial complex has called the president’s bluff. It polished its image by showing up at the big table and promising cooperation, then promptly went back to doing all it can to block real change. The insurers and the drug companies are, in effect, betting that Mr. Obama will be afraid to call them out on their duplicity.

It’s up to Mr. Obama to prove them wrong.

Paul Krugman is professor of Economics and International Affairs at Princeton University and a regular columnist for The New York Times. Krugman was the 2008 recipient of the Nobel Prize in Economics. He is the author of numerous books, including The Conscience of A Liberal, and his most recent, The Return of Depression Economics


Here's another link to look @.  http://www.commondreams.org/view/2009/05/23-4#comment-1211029

Friday, May 22, 2009

CHANGE IN THE PARKING METER?


The debate over New Jersey beach replenishment





You gotta love this. The NJDEP spokesperson's quote is a classic and shows you the attitude of these people. It's just chump change to them. Our chump change and their job. Arrogant, cocky and typical of what now runs everything in this country.

SCIENCE FRIDAY:- MARS ROVERS UPDATE YR. 6!

Mars Rover Spirit's 6 yr. journey map

It appears that after 6 yrs. Mars Rover SPIRIT might have finally dug itself in permanently.  Hopefully, SPIRIT's fate isn't analogous to our own Nat'l Spirit these days? America like Spirit on Mars seems to have bottomed out and is now spinning it's broken wheels, going nowhere. On the flip side though the other Rover on Mars Opportunity is still alive and rolling! make of this what you will, but if your interested @ all check the rest of the story out @ the title link.


Thursday, May 21, 2009

THE ERA OF THE BIG CASINO IS OVER!

Sen. Jim Whelan

The Headlines of the AC Press today should have said... CASINO ERA ENDS!  Of course you heard it here first long ago. It seems our State Senator and ex. 2 time Mayor of AC James Whelan has finally realized that the ERA of BIG Casinos in AC is OVER!  With casinos everywhere and newer then AC's fading giants, Sen. Whelan has publicly called for the first major reform of the almost 35 yr. old Casino law that brought Casino gaming to A.C. in 1978.  Back then a 500 room floor was put under all Casino developers. Whelan sensing that nobody is going to build squat in AC anymore if this rule holds has asked for a rewrite of the law to allow Casino gaming in Hotels with 200 rooms or more.  Why? because, with Wall St's. collapse he knows that the era of billion dollar casinos in AC is dead on arrival. 

FOUR PROJECTS CANCELLED!

Only two years ago AC was looking at four new mega-Casino projects and maybe even more with bader field up for sale as a possible site. So what happened?  The Great Recession is what happened. As of today AC's 11 existing  Casinos  revenue streams are off by more then 35% from two yrs. ago.  At the same time the new Pa., casinos are booming and Delaware is extending it's gaming into table games and sports betting sometime in the near future.  The news then for AC's gaming industry is bleak. So out of sheer desperation and almost 30 yrs. to late Whelan and the rest of the powers to be now realize that BIG is not all that it's cut out to be. That the BIG Casino's don't necessarily have AC's interest in mind and nor do they intend to invest much in our future.

BRING IN THE REST

It's kind of sad in a way to watch the local powers in panic and almost begging anyone with a buck to come and invest in AC. They've been so arrogant and so contemptuous of anyone but big Corps. for so long they've driven everyone else away or under. I'm not so sure the rest of the business community is going to believe things are indeed going to change in AC and take a chance. Why should they?  After 30 yrs. of Casino gaming it could be argued that AC is actually seedier and more dangerous today then it was at the start of the whole experiment. So, again I ask, why should anyone drop hundreds of millions to develop a small Casino when the big ones are dying?  

Wednesday, May 20, 2009

Tuesday, May 19, 2009

CH. 6 names Ocean City NJ's best beach?

  Ocean City NJ's Best Beach?

   CH 6 TV out of Philly has named Ocean City as NJ's best beach. I hate to see it's worse then. Ocean City's beach to be blunt, SUCKS. It's ugly and eroded on half of it length , filled with old groins, drainage pipes, and NJ's most comical scraggly ass so called dune. Parts of the beach are so badly eroded ( even after 25 different replenishments @ the cost of over $125 mil to the tax payers) that the boardwalk has less then 25 feet of beach in front of it. Next BIG storm and Ocean City won't have a beach or a boardwalk for blocks on it's north end. 
   CH 6 must be getting big advertising budgets this summer to promote OC is all I can figure out. Best beach ? LOL!  NOT!!!

Here's another article about this story and it has the other nine winners of NJ's best beach. None of them are that great. I wonder who made these picks? Margate rules , just ask LUCY!    http://www.nbc40.net/view_story.php?id=9294

Monday, May 18, 2009

North TopSail Beach , N.C.


@ the title link is an interesting little story about North TopSail beach and it's part in the ongoing Beach Replenishment epic happening everywhere.  Little dramas like this one are being played out up and down  all our coasts these days. This  one is interesting because I suspect the City Council didn't like the fact that this group wanted to make beachfront owners carry the cost of replensihing their beaches.  Hey, what good is the Fed. and State Gov't if it can't provide nice wide clean beaches for rich folks?  

Sunday, May 17, 2009

PHONY HEALTH CARE REFORM ON THE WAY!

Here's an excellent article and summary on what we can expect out of DC this yr. on health Care reform. It's not pretty. if you didn't like the Wall st. bail-out your really going to HATE the Health Ins. Big Pharma bail-out even worse. IMHO, this will be where Mr. Obama's popularity starts to decline. Delivering phony reforms isn't going to work.


Published on Sunday, May 17, 2009 by CommonDreams.org

Middle Class Healthcare Reform? Bend Over…

by Donna Smith

It's coming. You and me and every middle class, working person in this nation is about to start handing over more and more of their hard earned cash to the private insurance industry, courtesy of our own elected members of Congress and our very popular President. Fire up those Treasury Department presses. We're going to be printing and providing money for insurance companies like no bail-out we've seen yet this economic crisis cycle.

The healthcare legislation under design and so far under wraps for the American people is slowly being leaked via carefully staged forum and meetings and a few well-timed hearings and grand press announcements. Much of the work is still going on behind closed doors in private meetings attended by those who are deemed appropriate participants and industry friends.

Remember how open these proceedings were to be following all the Clinton plan debacles of the early 90s? Well, today's stagings are far more sophisticated and planned out. So learning did occur by the industry giants and their political friends over these last 17 years, I will give them that.

And what do we know so far about what middle class Americans can expect from the legislation being privately crafted?

First, no matter what percentage of your take home pay it takes, you will be legally required to buy private health insurance. Second, if all you can afford is a policy that leaves you financially exposed to bankruptcy and foreclosure, then you will still be legally required to purchase that private insurance product. Third, should you fail to buy a policy, you will pay a fine.

Like it so far? Feeling free and protected? Like the choices so far? It gets better.

The private, for-profit insurance industry has made concessions we are asked to celebrate. First, they'll issue every one of us a policy provided every one of us is legally forced to buy coverage. Second, they stop discriminating against women because they have uteruses and child-bearing capacity, provided we all have to buy their product. And third, and this was a real coup according to our leaders, the insurance companies, medical equipment folks and providers will slow the rate of increase in charging for their products to charge just a bit less in terms of percentages of overall costs than they had planned to do and as is predicted. Laughable concessions sold as real compromise.

It's as if we've been beaten a few times every month by an abuser whose violence and anger is increasing over time, and we know by calculating the trend that we'll be beaten daily within a very short time. Up steps the abuser to say, "Wait. I will still have to beat you more than I do now, but I think I can hold it to 25 times a month instead of every day." That's the sort of promises we're supposed to see as victories with the healthcare industry involvement in crafting the legislation that will determine our families' financial well-being and matters of life and death.

Let me spell this out for families like mine. You've been getting overcharged for underinsurance for many years and you've seen the costs out of your own pocket rise to the point where it is truly driving whether or not you even try to seek care when ill. You've seen premiums rise and coverage shrink in employer based coverage, and 14,000 of you a day are losing those employer based benefits in this stinking economy.

And most importantly to me and millions of other middle class folks, when you do get sick and need care, you are forced to see only those doctors and providers your insurance company says you can and those providers can only give you the insurance company says they can give you. That's the way our insurance companies want it now and forevermore, and that's what they are going to get.

Feeling free? Your choices broadening? Your costs lowering?

Wait. There's more. In order to make sure every single American buys the private products from insurance companies and knowing some families won't make enough to afford what is offered, we'll all chip in and pay our taxes to subsidize those who cannot afford to buy the pricey plans. So, when each of us calculates our own monthly costs for healthcare, we'll need to factor in not only our own health insurance premium, our co-pays and deductibles, our medications and other out-of-pocket costs, but also the percentage of our payroll taxes dedicated to pay for the subsidies for low-income folks, the agencies to collect the fines paid by health-insurance-mandate-evaders, and the agency envisioned to be our clearing house for selling us the private product we're all forced to buy. If our real costs are added up, there will be a substantial increase for most middle class families.

These folks are really hoping you will not do the math. They think middle class folks are too dumb to figure it out.

Let me repeat. This Congress and this President are about to give us healthcare reform that will make the middle class burden for payment higher and will even more deeply restrict personal choices in medical care. And they are about to do it all with great fanfare claiming just the opposite.

No doubt many of you have feared really looking at a single payer approach as something scary and restrictive of your personal freedoms. I can promise you that nothing could be further from the truth. In fact, your freedom to choose would be greatly enhanced under a publicly funded, privately delivered national program. Greatly enhanced freedom. Lowered costs as we each pay the percentage we can afford from our income. Greatly enhanced choice of providers - no more being told who is in-network or out. No more risk of financial ruin if medical care is not approved by a profit-driven entity. And no more being told a service we already received isn't covered after all - the great bait and switch the health insurance industry is allowed to do all the time, leaving so many people with bills they never even knew they were accepting responsibility to pay.

I like being free to choose. And if this healthcare reform plan restricts my freedom, takes my hard-earned money and makes my life more difficult, I won't have any problem at all assigning blame to the folks who forced it on me.

Look, what's the old saying about excrement rolling downhill? This president is very popular. He won't get blamed when middle class folks figure out the ruse. And the Senate is pretty safe, as they get to sit for six years before answering to the people - and they get oodles of cash from the industry to make sure they are comfy, cozy. It's the U.S. House of Representatives - the people's house, they say - that will take the hit when the moms and dads of this nation figure it out that they didn't get healthcare reform at all. The middle class will get a huge burden to bail-out the health insurance and healthcare industry under the plan moving so carefully but swiftly through the process.

The kicker? When it's finally unveiled in all its bi-partisan glory, it'll be sold as a human rights victory. And on that day, 60 more American families will bury a loved one denied care. And on the day after that, 60 more will die. And the day after that, they'll be a big damn party paid for by you and by me for all of those who helped craft the monstrosity. And the insurance industry CEO salaries will be enhanced by your money paid to them. Bail-out bonanza for Karen Ignagni and America's Health Insurance Plans, an industry very fond of its government entitlements.

Costs will be successfully shifted even more heavily onto the backs of America's middle class workers. I mean, middle class chumps. And then, my fellow worker-bees, it will be mid-term election time again.

Donna Smith is a community organizer for the California Nurses Association and National Co-Chair for the Progressive Democrats of America Healthcare Not Warfare campaign.

Saturday, May 16, 2009

BEACH BANTER:



THE GREAT RECESSION & THE AC ECONOMY

The local economy enters it's third straight yr. of decline this summer. Things starting going south for Atlantic County as far back as the summer of 2006.  Back then we saw the opening of the first Pa., slot parlours and ever since these have grown in number. Today of course were seeing the  collapse of the economy world-wide as the world has entered what's now being called the "Great Recession."  The present economic downturn is the worst since "the Great Depression" of the 1930's.  Millions are being thrown out of work as Industry after Industry trims it's work forces as business declines. This spiral down is fed by itself at some pt. as millions can no longer consume anything beyond the basics. This of course then impacts those Industries ( such as Casinos) and other forms of entertainment the hardest. Simply put millions are without work and the numbers are increasing steadily as unemployment is whats called a lagging indicator. The present offical Unemployment rate is 8.9% and rising. Other more accurate measures of unemployment are @ 15% and rising.  Locally, the rates are even higher.  An even more disturbing trend has appeared for our local economy after almost 31 yrs.  


SEASONAL ONCE AGAIN

It seems after 31 yrs. the local economy, that had become yr. round , because of a 24 hr. casinos , has now returned to being a more seasonal affair. Business starting last fall, fell off dramatically all winter and right into the spring.  Business at the Pa, Casinos rose accordingly. It seems were losing our base of slot players in the off season now. Some analysts say it's just a short term affect of the Recession. Personally, I don't agree. I think were seeing a new long term trend. Our off season market share is falling and has been since 2006. With the advent of table games in Del. coming and sports betting in Del. it's just a matter of time before Pa., allows table games in it's casinos. It's also just a matter of time before the Delaware ave. Casinos open , right by the Walt Whitman. This will put millions just a subway or bus ride away from a full service casino. There will be little incentive @ that juncture for people to drive 60+ miles to a decaying old resort with old run down and bankrupt casinos. Atlantic City has little else left to offer. Hell, it doesn't even have the simple pleasure of the Ocean view to offer  anymore. Thanks, to Ex-Mayor and now Senator Jim Whalen and his buddies at the NJDEP and the Army Corp. 

Friday, May 15, 2009

Pres. OBAMA on HEALTH CARE YESTERDAY



He's obviously NOT for single-payer, so we can forget that. The Revolution isn't happening. As for Change we can believe in? It sounds like were going to get Change the Health Ins. Industry can believe in.

Thursday, May 14, 2009

MORE BAD NEWS FOR the A.C. Casino Industry


The Wolves are Closing In

   The wolves are closing in on Atlantic City's Casino Industry these days. Delaware is going to allow table games in it's casinos and sports betting as well. This expansion of gaming so close to our market will only deepen the death spiral of the local casino Industry. It's also very likely that Delaware's expansion will trigger similar moves in Pa.'s fledgling Casinos Industry, as they rush to stay competitive. All of these developments will take even more market share away from A.C.


CASINOS EVERYWHERE


With Casino gaming popping up everywhere now, A.C. is being forced to examine it's future direction, as a resort. If it continues down it's present course in a few yrs. we will find ourselves right back to where we were in the early and mid-70's. At that time our grand old hotels had long  faded into mere relics of a bygone era. Today, however after 30+ yrs. of Casino gaming A.C. has failed to develop beyond the doors of the Casinos. Some would say the Corp. shopping mall in the center of the town is such an example, but is it? Those outlets are NOT locally owned and like the Casinos could and probably will pull up and leave as the resort's fortunes plunge further.

11 Casinos 2009

A.C. has 11 Casinos today and in 1997 it had 13.  Every major future Casino project has been cancelled and the one under construction ( REVEL) will be delayed , if it ever opens @ all?  The future of the area's economy is to be blunt POOR.  Just a few years ago with the opening of the Borgata everyone thought a new era of sparkling new Vegas style gaming halls was our future. That hope now appears to be gone. I predict that Borgata and others will be sold within the next 2 yrs. as the present owners of our local Casinos try desperately to sell.  Most of these halls are run by people who frankly don't have a clue and also don't have what it takes to compete in the viciously competitive gaming market that is developing in the surrounding States.  Do they care? No, these people also have no special allegiance to the area and will move on like the Big Corp.  vagabonds and carpetbaggers many of them are The easy days are long gone for A.C., when it's only competition lay 2,500 miles away. Today, Casinos are as common as CVS drug stores. Today, it will take a far more creative breed of owners and managers to survive in A.C. We face IMO a period of decline and a return to a seasonal economy, with long increasingly quiet winters.

Wednesday, May 13, 2009

NOW THEY WANT TO BE REGULATED?





Look Who's Begging for Regulation

by Jim Hightower

"Regulate the health insurance giants," chanted the reformers.

"Stop denying coverage to sick people," they demanded. "Stop jacking up premiums," they cried. "Health coverage for all," they bellowed.

It was an impressive show that the health care reform movement put on last week at a hearing before the Senate finance committee. It was especially impressive because those doing the chanting, demanding, crying and bellowing were not aggrieved outsiders, but the ultimate insiders - the health insurance giants themselves!

When the dogs begin demanding leashes, you now that something unusual is afoot.

Indeed, two things are afoot. First, the public is fed up with our country's insurance-dominated health care system, which cares first about corporate profits and only secondarily about the health needs of America's people. As a result, we pay more for health coverage than any other country, yet the quality of care we get ranks 37th in the world (below such countries as Malta, Morocco, Chile and Dominica).

Insurance companies maintain a massive money-sucking bureaucracy that exists essentially to say "no" to policy-holders who need approval for treatment and to say "hell no" to anyone who can't afford the ever-escalating price for those policies. In the richest country in the history of the world, 47 million Americans are uncovered, and many millions more have "coverage" so thin that it leaves their families out in the cold for most ailments. This is why 76 percent of the people said in a March poll by the Pew Research Center that our health care system either needs "fundamental changes" or needs to be "completely rebuilt."

Which brings us to the second factor in play: political change. Americans have been angry about the insurance-run system for years, but neither party produced results. Bill Clinton botched reform in the early '90s, spooking Democrats so badly that, for years, they wouldn't even attempt major reforms. George W. Bush and congressional Republicans never met an insurance company they wouldn't hug, take money from and serve faithfully, so they've simply ignored the people.

Last year, though, Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, John Edwards, Dennis Kucinich and other Democratic presidential contenders raised the reform flag high, ultimately carrying it into the White House.

Today, redoing the health care system is on Washington's front burner, including plans for a public insurance option to extend coverage to middle-class working families. This public entity would provide a missing level of competition, lower costs and instill some honesty in companies that had been gleefully profiteering on the present system.

Like vampires, health insurance corporations shrink from sunlight, so they have rushed an army of lobbyists to Washington in a desperate attempt to stave off this public option. However, they recognize that they are widely despised across the land and that even some Republican members of Congress will no longer stand for the status quo (as one Democratic leader noted, "Status quo is Latin for 'The Mess We're In'").

Thus, we're being treated to the delightfully dizzying sight of insurance executives begging Congress to harness them with new regulations. "We are comfortable with that," said the head of America's Health Insurance Plans (AHIP), the industry's chief lobbying group, which heretofore has ferociously opposed any and all protections for consumers.

Of course, AHIP members are wiley masters at slipping out of regulatory harnesses - remember, these are the people who hire roving packs of lawyers trained to write and enforce incomprehensible insurance policies that boil down to this: "Thank you for paying us to do our damnedest to stiff you."

In exchange for accepting such "regulation," AHIP wants Washington to require everyone in the country to buy health insurance from Aetna, Humana, United Health or its other members - with taxpayers covering the annual premiums of those who can't afford the policies. In other words, these private corporations would get a government-guaranteed market. What industry wouldn't be "comfortable" with that?

In the interest of America's health, insurance giants should never be made to feel comfortable. At the very least, real reform requires a public insurance option to assure competitive integrity - and to put some "care" back in health care.

National radio commentator, writer, public speaker, and author of the book, Swim Against The Current: Even A Dead Fish Can Go With The Flow, Jim Hightower has spent three decades battling the Powers That Be on behalf of the Powers That Ought To Be - consumers, working families, environmentalists, small businesses, and just-plain-folks.

Tuesday, May 12, 2009

THE HEALTH CARE PR SCAM


The Health Care Industry's PR Scam: Will Obama Fall for It?

by James Ridgeway

In a much-anticipated statement [yesterday], Barack Obama announced what is largely a public relations end-run by the health care industry, designed to trim a few scraps off of the nation's porcine health care budget, while preserving its basic system of medicine for profit.

In a letter to Obama that was released over the weekend, executives from the Advanced Medical Technology Association (the medical device manufacturers lobbying group), the American Hospital Association, the American Medical Association, America's Health Insurance Plans, and the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, as well as the Service Employees International Union, pledged to "do our part" to reduce health care costs. Their vague, pie-in-the sky promise amounts to just a 1.5 percent reduction in the growth rate of health care spending. Such is the explosion in health care costs that even this miniscule reduction represents a potential $2 trillion saving over 10 years. But there's no guarantee this figure will be achieved. As the Washington Post points out:

The groups did not spell out yesterday how they plan to reach such a target, and...they offer only a broad pledge, not an outright commitment....In addition, White House officials said, there is no mechanism to ensure that the groups live up to their offer, only the implicit threat of public embarrassment.

"Public embarrassment"? From Big Pharma and the health insurance companies--two of the most shameless industries in the history of corporate capitalism? In any case, even if the $2 trillion reduction is achieved, it clearly won't come out of industry profits. The Post reports:

Signers of the letter said that large amounts could be saved by aggressive efforts to prevent obesity, coordinate care, manage chronic illnesses and curtail unnecessary tests and procedures; by standardizing insurance claim forms; and by increasing the use of information technology, like electronic medical records.

So let's get this straight: Saving all this money depends on getting Americans to eat less? Good luck with that one. And the other brilliant cost-saving measures involve getting doctors to create computer records of all the overpriced drugs they prescribe, and giving patients easier forms to fill out before they get turned down six times by their private insurance companies?

Do you see a pattern here? None of these changes would make a dent in the industry's bottom line--and what's more, they could even enhance profits, by encouraging government-funded programs to help private companies streamline their bloated bureaucracy (much of which would instantly become superfluous under a public, single-payer system). The letter to Obama suggested this when it said: "We are committed to taking action in private-public partnership to create a more stable and sustainable health care system." We all know by now that "private-public partnership" usually means public investment for private profit.

It all adds up to a brilliant move, when you think about it. It makes the private health care companies look cooperative and proactive, rather than like the greedy obstructionists they really are. It gets these companies on the inside track with the administration, and creates common cause with the unions. In particular, it establishes a solid place at the table for the health insurance industry, the blood-sucking middlemen who ought to be kicked out of the health care system altogether. 

And what might the industry get in return for this generous "cooperation"? The Kaiser Daily Health Policy report today rounded up the possibilities:

The [Wall Street] Journal reports that although the groups did not ask for anything in return for the pledge, many of the factions are looking to prevent regulations that could "pose new burdens" or affect their profitability. For example, the health insurance industry is seeking to offset any reductions to their payments by obtaining new rules that would require all U.S. residents to have health coverage, according to the Journal. The Journal reports that health insurers have made several concessions intended to prevent a public option - which they fear could affect their profitability - as part of reform legislation (Wall Street Journal, 5/11). According to the AP/Philadelphia Inquirer, drugmakers are hoping to avoid a requirement that new drugs pass a cost-benefit test before receiving regulatory approval. In addition, hospitals and physicians are looking to avoid a system in which the government would dictate their payments for all patients, not just those under Medicare or Medicaid (Alonso-Zaldivar,AP/Philadelphia Inquirer, 5/11).

In other words, the underlying purpose of this PR stunt is to slow or block any meaningful health care reforms, which could actually improve care while reducing the price tag by a lot more than 1.5 percent. These include regulating the cost of pharmaceuticals and medical devices, curtailing or eliminating the role of the insurance companies, or introducing single-payer, which allows other developed countries to deliver superior health care for 20 to 40 percent less--all of which make $2 trillion in weight-loss programs and paperwork reduction measures look pretty pitiful by comparison.

All we can hope for is the possibility, remote as it may be, that Obama himself is also playing a PR game--making nice with the industry shills while planning some kind of genuine reform that will hit them in the only place that counts, and the only place where truly meaningful savings reside: their profit margins.

James Ridgeway is the Washington Correspondent for Mother Jones.




Great article! We can only hope Pres. Obama is allowing these scammers to show their hand before lowering the hammer on their game. If on the other hand if he's bought into their BS then all is lost. If so two betrayals of the public trust in his 1st three mos. tells u that Obama for all his talk is no reformer and "Change we can believe in", is just another Corp. marketing phrase.

Monday, May 11, 2009

FIXING THE INFRASTRUCTURE?

DUNE BEING TOPPED IN MAUI, Hawaii

Ah yes, they're sacred ( the Dunes) when they want your $$ to build them , but when they start to annoy , they gotta go ( as in lower Ventnor 2004), or worse the same folks just build right on top of them ( AC 2009).  Read  more about this @ the title link . 

DUNES - Can't live with em or without em.

It seems dunes are finding themselves under increasing pressure these days to conform or else!  The problem with dunes is they are messy and don't really live comfortably around lots of  people. Being an urban dune is a little like being an urban bird or animal. Your best strategy for survival is to stay out of the way of certain types of humans. I'm an agnostic when it comes to my dunes. I like the "real" thing in it's natural setting ( no where to close to human habitations or infrastructure ( AKA roads, sea walls, buildings etc. et al.)  Big dune fields in parks are a natural wonder and need to be protected. The manmade variety are another species entirely.  These ersatz dunes, built in many cases because they're the butt end of some coastal  engineering firms template and a requirement to get big chunks of taxpayers $$, are usually so artificial looking it's painful to look @ them. Nevertheless, even these sad things need to be protected, usually from the same crowd that begs for them in the 1st place. Trouble is once in place the people tasked to protect and preserve them aren't really all that motivated to do just that. 

Sunday, May 10, 2009

HAPPY MOTHER'S DAY FROM @ THE BEACH!!



Mother's Day isn't just a day we celebrate our own Mother's, it's also a day we celebrate MOTHER NATURE! Where better to celebrate, then where the four ancient elements Fire ( light), Earth ( the beach), Water ( the Ocean), and Air ( the Sky ) all join together seamlessly -- @ THE BEACH!

Saturday, May 09, 2009

WE WANT MORE NOW!!

The Sand lobby throws another Tantrum !

Didn't I say in my post just yesterday that the Pols would be whining and crying soon enough that Obama isn't giving them enough $$$ for sand? Read the article @ the title link.

Friday, May 08, 2009

OBAMA FUMBLES ON BEACH REPLENISHMENT!!

   Oh well,  Obama Admin. has shown their political immaturity on this one. It appears, much to my chagrin Obama's admin. is reversing 24 yrs. of sound budgetary policies followed by the GOP and the Dems. till now. The OMB is allocating $45 mil. in the 2010 budget for so called Beach Replenishment Projects. Of course the Porkers are already whining they need a more serious bail-out to the tune of billions. It's a sad day here @ the Beach. It appears the Obama people have IMHO stupidly caved to the "Sand Lobby" and their K street pals and lobbyists @ Marlowe and Co.   Read all about it @ the title link.
   Folks, I'm as you know, not one to gloss bad news here @ the Beach. This was a very bad day for our cause. Not only are the Nat'l Dems. showing theirPork barrel kings but worse,  the local Dems. now think it's ok to build right up to the Ocean and they want it written in law. The Dems. talk about how they follow the science in these decisions, but at least in this particuliar case it's not true. The science is solidly against these projects. What's happening here is strictly political. It's all about the grease ( $$) folks, science is for the chumps.

WHELAN BILL PROPOSES MAJOR SEAWARD EXPANSION IN AC !!

Atlantic City Bally's Casino's Beach Bar

Buried today in the AC Press ' region section, is an article about a new law being proposed by State Senator James Whelan D- Atlantic. Whelan two time Mayor of AC and the man directly responsible for robbing millions of any view on the boardwalk, because of his promotion of the Army Corp. AISPP , is now asking for a new law to allow any beach front business in AC to essentially expand to with 50 feet of the Atlantic Ocean @ high tide. This astounding expansion, if allowed will essentially move Atlantic City on top of the so called protective AISPP dune, because it will allow sewer, electric, cable and water lines to be  placed on the beach permanently! The present bill would still require the walls and ceilings of these so called temporary structures to be removed in the fall. So what! The really important parts of these so called temporary structures are the sewer, water, cable and electric lines that will be left in the dunes and within 50 ft. of the ocean! I'm sure streets will be next.


How it Happens

This is no surprise to me. This is in fact,  exactly what I predicted would happen almost 10 yrs. ago. Whelan and his clients the Casinos first get the AISPP and then use the temporarily widened beach as an excuse to build "temporary bars" on them to attract visitors. These bars are now the only place visitors can sit and view the ocean from. ( the boardwalk now rendered useless by the Dune). Then the casinos use bad economic times ( today), to go back to "their" State Senator and ask for relief from having to take these structures down after 3 mos. They don't ask for the entire structure to be removed( yet). The 1st step here is to ask for the pads to placed permanently. The pads have as I said,  all the electric, sewer, cable and water. The walls and ceilings are then added. The next step in a few yrs, will be ask to allow these structures to be permanent. Thus by stages, we would have allowed a permanent seaward expansion of the town. 

Global Warming and Sea rise

One wonders whether Senator Whelan ever bothers to read the paper or listen to the endless discourse all over the media and everywhere else these days, concerning one of the major effects of the present Global warming going on? Seantor Whelan ...HELLO!! Didn't the NJDEP tell you Sir that the Atlantic Ocean is rapidly rising?  So, instead of retreating in anticipation of the rising sea AC is going to do just the opposite and for a few dollars allow a wholesale expansion of the city's infrastructure onto the DUNE, built specifically to protect tha t very infrastructure. This  mindless greedy expansion will in fact and deed nullify any protection of the so called AISPP. 


The Next Act

Here's my prediction. Whelan and his Casino bosses will get their permanently built bars, restaurants etc on the beach. This will amount in the end to a land grab of historic proportions, but nobody will notice till it's to late. The City of Atlantic City is essentially GIVING away for pennies it's Ocean front beach. Once these structures are permanent and they eventually will be just that, the owners will go back to the State and ask for an further expansion of a now narrowed beach. They will ask for the taxpayers to PROTECT their new bars, restaurants etc. Eventually 20 yrs. from now they will build the casinos themselves right up to the edge of the receding beach as well. They will then claim that they own the beach through USE or some other legal land grab. ( or they'll buy whoever is in power then and get another law written , giving them the beach).


POWER

This is how BIG Corps. do what they do. They press endlessly to expand their realms. They buy the pols and anyone else they need to do this.  Even as the Casinos in this example are rapidly failing they audaciously grab more land in AC and expand onto the PUBLIC domain. Do our so called Reps. care? NO! HELL NO! They will instead do just the wrong thing and buy into this stupidity. Congratulations , Senator Whelan Mission Accomplished... for the Casinos.

Thursday, May 07, 2009

HERE COMES THE SANDMAN



Good artlice @ the Title link. The battle for the beach goes on everywhere these days. Lots of very serious opposition to what the Army Corp is doing is starting to appear. 

Wednesday, May 06, 2009

WAVES - BY CLARK LITTLE








They all speak for themselves!  The sheer beauty of these shots is awe inspiring to anyone who loves the sea and the beach. The artistry and orginality is mind boggling, one wonders how did he get these shots? They almost look like surreal paintings not photos!

Tuesday, May 05, 2009

PRES. OBAMA - NO STIM. $$ FOR BEACHES

The Obama Admin. is standing firm in it's position that NO Stimulus $$ will be used for any Army Corp. beach projects.  Marlowe and Co. thought they could use the economic emergency to get the new Admin. to ignore a 25 yr. old Executive branch precedent forbidding any Fed. $$ to be allocated for Beach Projects.  Today's Army Corp. Projects are all created by Congressional earmarks ( pork).  It's no surprise that OMB has wisely kept the President out of this. Now Lobiondo and the rest will have to go back to begging each other for taxpayer $$ for these projects.

@ the title link is a another article about this.

Monday, May 04, 2009

MEXICO PREPARES TO RE-OPEN !!

The ALL CLEAR IS sounding if anyone out here is still listening.  @ the title link read the article in the NY Times on this topic. Mexico is starting to re-open it's schools , restaurants etc. as the fear subsides. The so called H1N1 flu it turns out is not as novel as everyone was making out. In fact it appears most older people ( over 40) on earth might have been exposed to it before and it's believed have some kind of immunity to it.  

Did the W.H.O.  over react?

IMO the W.H.O. pulled the trigger way to soon on this one. After it's all over, I hope these orgs. do a through review of this incident. It could serve as a good exercise for when the "REAL" thing rolls down the pike someday. In the mean time I hope that the media helps to calm everyone down. 

Saturday, May 02, 2009

SWINE FLU LESS SERIOUS THEN 1ST THOUGHT!


Luckily,   It's turning out that so called SWINE FLU, or H1N1 as President Obama has called it, is probably no more serious then already existing varieties. @ the title link is an excellent article detailing this welcome development. The ALL CLEAR hasn't sounded quite yet, but it's looking a whole lot better then it did a few days ago.  


THE W.H.O Alert system is badly Flawed

The W.H.O. alert system needs a re-vamping.  As it turns out the alert scale only refers to the SPREAD of the disease...NOT the SEVERITY! I was asking all along what the severity was , the age of the victims and how they died for precisely the reasons the article @ the link discusses. The W.H.O. needs to add a second meter to their alerts and it should be about SEVERITY.  Who cares whether a minor infection becomes a pandemic? The present alert system leaves far to the imagination of the public. 


POOR DECISION MAKING PROCESS?


I assumed, as did it seems every Gov't on earth and the C.D.C. that the W.H.O. was issuing an alert because they already had hard data that this disease was a major menace. 
Apparently, they had squat and jumped the gun.  Somebody needs to review the decision making process at the W.H.O. immediately. The world cannot abide too many such bad calls from such an important agency.  Without credibility this org. loses all of it's authority.



100 yrs. HAPPY BIRTHDAY - MARGATE CITY 1909-2009

LUCY - MARGATE's 1st Citizen and Leading Lady

   I think James Rafferty the land speculator and promoter would probably be pretty pleased about how his promotion turned out  128 yrs. later.  Rafferty built "Lucy the Elephant" to promote land sales, in what was then called South Atlantic City or Absecon Beach.  At that time only Atlantic City to our north and Longport to our south were in existence.  Atlantic City by 1881 was already a Nationally famous resort and Longport was 20 blocks longer.  Tourists would take the trolley down from AC in those days to visit Lucy and party at the line of rowdy bars and roadhouses that built up to service these folks.  They also came  downbeach as we say, to fish and sunbathe. Eventually, however they started to buy up the land and build summer cottages.  From 1881 to 1909 Margate was called South Atlantic City and even incorporated as such for a time. In 1909 it was re-Incorporated on April 20th as Margate City.  The name being unceremoniously borrowed from Margate, England. Margate, England was by that time England's premiere and 1st  seaside resort for almost 600 yrs.!  The name itself was obviously created by joining the Spanish/French Mar/Mer for (Sea) and the English  word gate and means "Gateway to the Sea."  Margate in the county of Kent in England was also an important coastal fishing  port back then , as it is today.  Margate, New Jersey in the county of Atlantic however is primarily today an exclusive summer beach resort. ( with the Island's finest beaches).  Today, as during it's early years , Margate's homes are owned primarily by people who do not live here yr. round.   Over 60% of the homes are now second homes and are empty most of the year.  This wasn't always the case. For about 30 yrs. from the 50's to the mid-80's Margate was actually a thriving suburb for Atlantic City, with a much higher % of year round residents.  That trend reversed starting in the late 70's and continues today. Eventually, Margate will be like it's neighbors Ventnor and Longport , primarily summer resorts for the upper middle class and the wealthy.  So, over the course of it's 128 history Margate has come full circle.  Margate has a lot to be proud of. While all around us today a major Recession rages, Margate lives in an affluent bubble , where new homes are still being constructed as the older housing stock is torn down. Buyers still are flocking to Margate and we can only hope this trend will continue , even as Atlantic City is in another of it's cyclical  declines. 
    Margate is today without a doubt Absecon Island's finest beach / bayfront resort.  It has the Islands best beaches and marinas , it also still hosts the Island finest restaurants and shops as well as it's best schools. Margate is also extremely well run by a full-time administration. Margate's citizen's although fewer in number today, are also very involved in their community.  In short, Margate is a very nice place to live and raise a family.


HAPPY 100th Birthday to Everyone in Margate !!

Friday, May 01, 2009

BEACH ACCESS ETC.

How Welcome are We?

@ the title link is an article that lays out pretty well the other argument for the recently defeated  NJDEP regulations governing beach access in NJ.  The folks that want to take Fed. and State tax dollars to replenish their beaches in some cases also don't REALLY want the general public having very good access to these "public beaches." One of the ways access is denied is to provide such limited parking and access paths that the public needs to walk miles to get to these particular beaches. The State DEP in my view is correct in their evaluation that such communities are essentially taking public money to replenish what are actually semi-private beaches. This kind of game is played in the wealthier Townes in NJ. Avalon &  Stone Harbor, are examples of this kind of access limiting behavior. To be fair other Townes that don't take Fed. and State tax dollars , such as Margate and Longport also play at this access limiting game. They do it by limiting parking on their beach block streets May thru Sept. In my view their just as wrong for other reasons. In essence what the DEP is saying is these exclusive communities want their cake ( the sand) and they also want to eat it ( private beaches).  Of course making sure the ultra-wealthy have nice sandy wide beaches is important to some  politicians, since it's these same folks that often fund their re-elections , so whose surprised. In my view it's simple, these towns shouldn't take State and Fed. tax dollars if they want private beaches. They should stop whining about how they need these beaches replenished ( by the rest of us) for business and jobs. Why? because , it's a BIG FAT LIE!  They want the sand to benefit their tony little Townes and to keep the prices of their real estate stock at the top. What they don't want is the scraggly crowd of citizens ( tax payers) that go to AC or Wildwood to arrive "shoebox" lunch under their skinny white, yellow, red, brown & black arms.  So, the DEP is right on this one. You want a quasi-  private resort for a few,  pay for the sand yourself or do as Margate and Longport have done. ( don't join the State or Fed. beach Projects offered to you.) If you do decide to accept $$ for these projects don't be surprised when the NJDEP and eventually the State legislature passes regs. and soon laws telling your community how to regulate what you thought was your beach. 

BRAGGING RIGHTS?

   Avalon's Mayor P might be bragging he beat the NJDEP, but I can tell him from experience these folks don't back down easily .  That, I don't agree with them on Beach Replenishment as an effective and  proper strategy for coastal managaement, doesn't mean they are always wrong on everything. In this case , I personally agree with some of the DEP regs. on Fed. and State funded Replenished beaches. I hope the State eventually writes rules forcing better access for the public in coastal communities that are working actively to  deny us it.