Sunday, May 31, 2009
THE COST CONUNDRUM
Saturday, May 30, 2009
BEACH BANTER

Thursday, May 28, 2009
EVERYTHING IS ON THE TABLE - EXCEPT THE SOLUTION:
Powerful video, take a few mins. and watch.
Wednesday, May 27, 2009
WASHED OUT TO SEA
Although, I'm not thrilled with the total report , it does make some good pts and I love the cover. The conclusion that somehow we should take the beach replenishment $$ and waste it on river levees, to essentially do the same thing, is as laughable, as it is hypocritical, ( considering the author Tom Coburn (R) no surprise here.) It's still worth a read.
Tuesday, May 26, 2009
HAS VENTNOR EVER OFFICIALLY JOINED THE AISPP?

Sunday, May 24, 2009
MEMORIAL DAY WEEKEND- NEVER FORGET!

THE DEBATE IS ON:
Saturday, May 23, 2009
BLUE DOUBLE CROSS
That didn’t take long. Less than two weeks have passed since much of the medical-industrial complex made a big show of working with President Obama on health care reform — and the double-crossing is already well under way. Indeed, it’s now clear that even as they met with the president, pretending to be cooperative, insurers were gearing up to play the same destructive role they did the last time health reform was on the agenda.
So here’s the question: Will Mr. Obama gloss over the reality of what’s happening, and try to preserve the appearance of cooperation? Or will he honor his own pledge, made back during the campaign, to go on the offensive against special interests if they stand in the way of reform?
The story so far: on May 11 the White House called a news conference to announce that major players in health care, including the American Hospital Association and the lobbying group America’s Health Insurance Plans, had come together to support a national effort to control health care costs.
The fact sheet on the meeting, one has to say, was classic Obama in its message of post-partisanship and, um, hope. “For too long, politics and point-scoring have prevented our country from tackling this growing crisis,” it said, adding, “The American people are eager to put the old Washington ways behind them.”
But just three days later the hospital association insisted that it had not, in fact, promised what the president said it had promised — that it had made no commitment to the administration’s goal of reducing the rate at which health care costs are rising by 1.5 percentage points a year. And the head of the insurance lobby said that the idea was merely to “ramp up” savings, whatever that means.
Meanwhile, the insurance industry is busily lobbying Congress to block one crucial element of health care reform, the public option — that is, offering Americans the right to buy insurance directly from the government as well as from private insurance companies. And at least some insurers are gearing up for a major smear campaign.
On Monday, just a week after the White House photo-op, The Washington Post reported that Blue Cross Blue Shield of North Carolina was preparing to run a series of ads attacking the public option. The planning for this ad campaign must have begun quite some time ago.
The Post has the storyboards for the ads, and they read just like the infamous Harry and Louise ads that helped kill health care reform in 1993. Troubled Americans are shown being denied their choice of doctor, or forced to wait months for appointments, by faceless government bureaucrats. It’s a scary image that might make some sense if private health insurance — which these days comes primarily via HMOs — offered all of us free choice of doctors, with no wait for medical procedures. But my health plan isn’t like that. Is yours?
“We can do a lot better than a government-run health care system,” says a voice-over in one of the ads. To which the obvious response is, if that’s true, why don’t you? Why deny Americans the chance to reject government insurance if it’s really that bad?
For none of the reform proposals currently on the table would force people into a government-run insurance plan. At most they would offer Americans the choice of buying into such a plan.
And the goal of the insurers is to deny Americans that choice. They fear that many people would prefer a government plan to dealing with private insurance companies that, in the real world as opposed to the world of their ads, are more bureaucratic than any government agency, routinely deny clients their choice of doctor, and often refuse to pay for care.
Which brings us back to Mr. Obama.
Back during the Democratic primary campaign, Mr. Obama argued that the Clintons had failed in their 1993 attempt to reform health care because they had been insufficiently inclusive. He promised instead to gather all the stakeholders, including the insurance companies, around a “big table.” And that May 11 event was, of course, intended precisely to show this big-table strategy in action.
But what if interest groups showed up at the big table, then blocked reform? Back then, Mr. Obama assured voters that he would get tough: “If those insurance companies and drug companies start trying to run ads with Harry and Louise, I’ll run my own ads as president. I’ll get on television and say ‘Harry and Louise are lying.’ ”
The question now is whether he really meant it.
The medical-industrial complex has called the president’s bluff. It polished its image by showing up at the big table and promising cooperation, then promptly went back to doing all it can to block real change. The insurers and the drug companies are, in effect, betting that Mr. Obama will be afraid to call them out on their duplicity.
It’s up to Mr. Obama to prove them wrong.
Paul Krugman is professor of Economics and International Affairs at Princeton University and a regular columnist for The New York Times. Krugman was the 2008 recipient of the Nobel Prize in Economics. He is the author of numerous books, including The Conscience of A Liberal, and his most recent, The Return of Depression Economics.
Here's another link to look @. http://www.commondreams.org/view/2009/05/23-4#comment-1211029
Friday, May 22, 2009
CHANGE IN THE PARKING METER?
The debate over New Jersey beach replenishment |
You gotta love this. The NJDEP spokesperson's quote is a classic and shows you the attitude of these people. It's just chump change to them. Our chump change and their job. Arrogant, cocky and typical of what now runs everything in this country.
SCIENCE FRIDAY:- MARS ROVERS UPDATE YR. 6!
Thursday, May 21, 2009
THE ERA OF THE BIG CASINO IS OVER!
Wednesday, May 20, 2009
FUN VIDEO - NJ's WORST BEACH?
| Ledger Live: What is the worst beach in New Jersey |
Tuesday, May 19, 2009
CH. 6 names Ocean City NJ's best beach?
Monday, May 18, 2009
North TopSail Beach , N.C.
Sunday, May 17, 2009
PHONY HEALTH CARE REFORM ON THE WAY!
Middle Class Healthcare Reform? Bend Over…
by Donna Smith
The healthcare legislation under design and so far under wraps for the American people is slowly being leaked via carefully staged forum and meetings and a few well-timed hearings and grand press announcements. Much of the work is still going on behind closed doors in private meetings attended by those who are deemed appropriate participants and industry friends.
Remember how open these proceedings were to be following all the Clinton plan debacles of the early 90s? Well, today's stagings are far more sophisticated and planned out. So learning did occur by the industry giants and their political friends over these last 17 years, I will give them that.
And what do we know so far about what middle class Americans can expect from the legislation being privately crafted?
First, no matter what percentage of your take home pay it takes, you will be legally required to buy private health insurance. Second, if all you can afford is a policy that leaves you financially exposed to bankruptcy and foreclosure, then you will still be legally required to purchase that private insurance product. Third, should you fail to buy a policy, you will pay a fine.
Like it so far? Feeling free and protected? Like the choices so far? It gets better.
The private, for-profit insurance industry has made concessions we are asked to celebrate. First, they'll issue every one of us a policy provided every one of us is legally forced to buy coverage. Second, they stop discriminating against women because they have uteruses and child-bearing capacity, provided we all have to buy their product. And third, and this was a real coup according to our leaders, the insurance companies, medical equipment folks and providers will slow the rate of increase in charging for their products to charge just a bit less in terms of percentages of overall costs than they had planned to do and as is predicted. Laughable concessions sold as real compromise.
It's as if we've been beaten a few times every month by an abuser whose violence and anger is increasing over time, and we know by calculating the trend that we'll be beaten daily within a very short time. Up steps the abuser to say, "Wait. I will still have to beat you more than I do now, but I think I can hold it to 25 times a month instead of every day." That's the sort of promises we're supposed to see as victories with the healthcare industry involvement in crafting the legislation that will determine our families' financial well-being and matters of life and death.
Let me spell this out for families like mine. You've been getting overcharged for underinsurance for many years and you've seen the costs out of your own pocket rise to the point where it is truly driving whether or not you even try to seek care when ill. You've seen premiums rise and coverage shrink in employer based coverage, and 14,000 of you a day are losing those employer based benefits in this stinking economy.
And most importantly to me and millions of other middle class folks, when you do get sick and need care, you are forced to see only those doctors and providers your insurance company says you can and those providers can only give you the insurance company says they can give you. That's the way our insurance companies want it now and forevermore, and that's what they are going to get.
Feeling free? Your choices broadening? Your costs lowering?
Wait. There's more. In order to make sure every single American buys the private products from insurance companies and knowing some families won't make enough to afford what is offered, we'll all chip in and pay our taxes to subsidize those who cannot afford to buy the pricey plans. So, when each of us calculates our own monthly costs for healthcare, we'll need to factor in not only our own health insurance premium, our co-pays and deductibles, our medications and other out-of-pocket costs, but also the percentage of our payroll taxes dedicated to pay for the subsidies for low-income folks, the agencies to collect the fines paid by health-insurance-mandate-evaders, and the agency envisioned to be our clearing house for selling us the private product we're all forced to buy. If our real costs are added up, there will be a substantial increase for most middle class families.
These folks are really hoping you will not do the math. They think middle class folks are too dumb to figure it out.
Let me repeat. This Congress and this President are about to give us healthcare reform that will make the middle class burden for payment higher and will even more deeply restrict personal choices in medical care. And they are about to do it all with great fanfare claiming just the opposite.
No doubt many of you have feared really looking at a single payer approach as something scary and restrictive of your personal freedoms. I can promise you that nothing could be further from the truth. In fact, your freedom to choose would be greatly enhanced under a publicly funded, privately delivered national program. Greatly enhanced freedom. Lowered costs as we each pay the percentage we can afford from our income. Greatly enhanced choice of providers - no more being told who is in-network or out. No more risk of financial ruin if medical care is not approved by a profit-driven entity. And no more being told a service we already received isn't covered after all - the great bait and switch the health insurance industry is allowed to do all the time, leaving so many people with bills they never even knew they were accepting responsibility to pay.
I like being free to choose. And if this healthcare reform plan restricts my freedom, takes my hard-earned money and makes my life more difficult, I won't have any problem at all assigning blame to the folks who forced it on me.
Look, what's the old saying about excrement rolling downhill? This president is very popular. He won't get blamed when middle class folks figure out the ruse. And the Senate is pretty safe, as they get to sit for six years before answering to the people - and they get oodles of cash from the industry to make sure they are comfy, cozy. It's the U.S. House of Representatives - the people's house, they say - that will take the hit when the moms and dads of this nation figure it out that they didn't get healthcare reform at all. The middle class will get a huge burden to bail-out the health insurance and healthcare industry under the plan moving so carefully but swiftly through the process.
The kicker? When it's finally unveiled in all its bi-partisan glory, it'll be sold as a human rights victory. And on that day, 60 more American families will bury a loved one denied care. And on the day after that, 60 more will die. And the day after that, they'll be a big damn party paid for by you and by me for all of those who helped craft the monstrosity. And the insurance industry CEO salaries will be enhanced by your money paid to them. Bail-out bonanza for Karen Ignagni and America's Health Insurance Plans, an industry very fond of its government entitlements.
Costs will be successfully shifted even more heavily onto the backs of America's middle class workers. I mean, middle class chumps. And then, my fellow worker-bees, it will be mid-term election time again.
Donna Smith is a community organizer for the California Nurses Association and National Co-Chair for the Progressive Democrats of America Healthcare Not Warfare campaign.
Saturday, May 16, 2009
BEACH BANTER:

Friday, May 15, 2009
Pres. OBAMA on HEALTH CARE YESTERDAY
He's obviously NOT for single-payer, so we can forget that. The Revolution isn't happening. As for Change we can believe in? It sounds like were going to get Change the Health Ins. Industry can believe in.
Thursday, May 14, 2009
MORE BAD NEWS FOR the A.C. Casino Industry

The wolves are closing in on Atlantic City's Casino Industry these days. Delaware is going to allow table games in it's casinos and sports betting as well. This expansion of gaming so close to our market will only deepen the death spiral of the local casino Industry. It's also very likely that Delaware's expansion will trigger similar moves in Pa.'s fledgling Casinos Industry, as they rush to stay competitive. All of these developments will take even more market share away from A.C.
Wednesday, May 13, 2009
NOW THEY WANT TO BE REGULATED?
Look Who's Begging for Regulation
by Jim Hightower
"Regulate the health insurance giants," chanted the reformers.
"Stop denying coverage to sick people," they demanded. "Stop jacking up premiums," they cried. "Health coverage for all," they bellowed.
It was an impressive show that the health care reform movement put on last week at a hearing before the Senate finance committee. It was especially impressive because those doing the chanting, demanding, crying and bellowing were not aggrieved outsiders, but the ultimate insiders - the health insurance giants themselves!
When the dogs begin demanding leashes, you now that something unusual is afoot.
Indeed, two things are afoot. First, the public is fed up with our country's insurance-dominated health care system, which cares first about corporate profits and only secondarily about the health needs of America's people. As a result, we pay more for health coverage than any other country, yet the quality of care we get ranks 37th in the world (below such countries as Malta, Morocco, Chile and Dominica).
Insurance companies maintain a massive money-sucking bureaucracy that exists essentially to say "no" to policy-holders who need approval for treatment and to say "hell no" to anyone who can't afford the ever-escalating price for those policies. In the richest country in the history of the world, 47 million Americans are uncovered, and many millions more have "coverage" so thin that it leaves their families out in the cold for most ailments. This is why 76 percent of the people said in a March poll by the Pew Research Center that our health care system either needs "fundamental changes" or needs to be "completely rebuilt."
Which brings us to the second factor in play: political change. Americans have been angry about the insurance-run system for years, but neither party produced results. Bill Clinton botched reform in the early '90s, spooking Democrats so badly that, for years, they wouldn't even attempt major reforms. George W. Bush and congressional Republicans never met an insurance company they wouldn't hug, take money from and serve faithfully, so they've simply ignored the people.
Last year, though, Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, John Edwards, Dennis Kucinich and other Democratic presidential contenders raised the reform flag high, ultimately carrying it into the White House.
Today, redoing the health care system is on Washington's front burner, including plans for a public insurance option to extend coverage to middle-class working families. This public entity would provide a missing level of competition, lower costs and instill some honesty in companies that had been gleefully profiteering on the present system.
Like vampires, health insurance corporations shrink from sunlight, so they have rushed an army of lobbyists to Washington in a desperate attempt to stave off this public option. However, they recognize that they are widely despised across the land and that even some Republican members of Congress will no longer stand for the status quo (as one Democratic leader noted, "Status quo is Latin for 'The Mess We're In'").
Thus, we're being treated to the delightfully dizzying sight of insurance executives begging Congress to harness them with new regulations. "We are comfortable with that," said the head of America's Health Insurance Plans (AHIP), the industry's chief lobbying group, which heretofore has ferociously opposed any and all protections for consumers.
Of course, AHIP members are wiley masters at slipping out of regulatory harnesses - remember, these are the people who hire roving packs of lawyers trained to write and enforce incomprehensible insurance policies that boil down to this: "Thank you for paying us to do our damnedest to stiff you."
In exchange for accepting such "regulation," AHIP wants Washington to require everyone in the country to buy health insurance from Aetna, Humana, United Health or its other members - with taxpayers covering the annual premiums of those who can't afford the policies. In other words, these private corporations would get a government-guaranteed market. What industry wouldn't be "comfortable" with that?
In the interest of America's health, insurance giants should never be made to feel comfortable. At the very least, real reform requires a public insurance option to assure competitive integrity - and to put some "care" back in health care.
National radio commentator, writer, public speaker, and author of the book, Swim Against The Current: Even A Dead Fish Can Go With The Flow, Jim Hightower has spent three decades battling the Powers That Be on behalf of the Powers That Ought To Be - consumers, working families, environmentalists, small businesses, and just-plain-folks.
Tuesday, May 12, 2009
THE HEALTH CARE PR SCAM
The Health Care Industry's PR Scam: Will Obama Fall for It?
by James Ridgeway
In a much-anticipated statement [yesterday], Barack Obama announced what is largely a public relations end-run by the health care industry, designed to trim a few scraps off of the nation's porcine health care budget, while preserving its basic system of medicine for profit.
In a letter to Obama that was released over the weekend, executives from the Advanced Medical Technology Association (the medical device manufacturers lobbying group), the American Hospital Association, the American Medical Association, America's Health Insurance Plans, and the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, as well as the Service Employees International Union, pledged to "do our part" to reduce health care costs. Their vague, pie-in-the sky promise amounts to just a 1.5 percent reduction in the growth rate of health care spending. Such is the explosion in health care costs that even this miniscule reduction represents a potential $2 trillion saving over 10 years. But there's no guarantee this figure will be achieved. As the Washington Post points out:
The groups did not spell out yesterday how they plan to reach such a target, and...they offer only a broad pledge, not an outright commitment....In addition, White House officials said, there is no mechanism to ensure that the groups live up to their offer, only the implicit threat of public embarrassment.
"Public embarrassment"? From Big Pharma and the health insurance companies--two of the most shameless industries in the history of corporate capitalism? In any case, even if the $2 trillion reduction is achieved, it clearly won't come out of industry profits. The Post reports:
Signers of the letter said that large amounts could be saved by aggressive efforts to prevent obesity, coordinate care, manage chronic illnesses and curtail unnecessary tests and procedures; by standardizing insurance claim forms; and by increasing the use of information technology, like electronic medical records.
So let's get this straight: Saving all this money depends on getting Americans to eat less? Good luck with that one. And the other brilliant cost-saving measures involve getting doctors to create computer records of all the overpriced drugs they prescribe, and giving patients easier forms to fill out before they get turned down six times by their private insurance companies?
Do you see a pattern here? None of these changes would make a dent in the industry's bottom line--and what's more, they could even enhance profits, by encouraging government-funded programs to help private companies streamline their bloated bureaucracy (much of which would instantly become superfluous under a public, single-payer system). The letter to Obama suggested this when it said: "We are committed to taking action in private-public partnership to create a more stable and sustainable health care system." We all know by now that "private-public partnership" usually means public investment for private profit.
It all adds up to a brilliant move, when you think about it. It makes the private health care companies look cooperative and proactive, rather than like the greedy obstructionists they really are. It gets these companies on the inside track with the administration, and creates common cause with the unions. In particular, it establishes a solid place at the table for the health insurance industry, the blood-sucking middlemen who ought to be kicked out of the health care system altogether.
And what might the industry get in return for this generous "cooperation"? The Kaiser Daily Health Policy report today rounded up the possibilities:
The [Wall Street] Journal reports that although the groups did not ask for anything in return for the pledge, many of the factions are looking to prevent regulations that could "pose new burdens" or affect their profitability. For example, the health insurance industry is seeking to offset any reductions to their payments by obtaining new rules that would require all U.S. residents to have health coverage, according to the Journal. The Journal reports that health insurers have made several concessions intended to prevent a public option - which they fear could affect their profitability - as part of reform legislation (Wall Street Journal, 5/11). According to the AP/Philadelphia Inquirer, drugmakers are hoping to avoid a requirement that new drugs pass a cost-benefit test before receiving regulatory approval. In addition, hospitals and physicians are looking to avoid a system in which the government would dictate their payments for all patients, not just those under Medicare or Medicaid (Alonso-Zaldivar,AP/Philadelphia Inquirer, 5/11).
In other words, the underlying purpose of this PR stunt is to slow or block any meaningful health care reforms, which could actually improve care while reducing the price tag by a lot more than 1.5 percent. These include regulating the cost of pharmaceuticals and medical devices, curtailing or eliminating the role of the insurance companies, or introducing single-payer, which allows other developed countries to deliver superior health care for 20 to 40 percent less--all of which make $2 trillion in weight-loss programs and paperwork reduction measures look pretty pitiful by comparison.
All we can hope for is the possibility, remote as it may be, that Obama himself is also playing a PR game--making nice with the industry shills while planning some kind of genuine reform that will hit them in the only place that counts, and the only place where truly meaningful savings reside: their profit margins.
James Ridgeway is the Washington Correspondent for Mother Jones.
Great article! We can only hope Pres. Obama is allowing these scammers to show their hand before lowering the hammer on their game. If on the other hand if he's bought into their BS then all is lost. If so two betrayals of the public trust in his 1st three mos. tells u that Obama for all his talk is no reformer and "Change we can believe in", is just another Corp. marketing phrase.
Monday, May 11, 2009
FIXING THE INFRASTRUCTURE?

Sunday, May 10, 2009
HAPPY MOTHER'S DAY FROM @ THE BEACH!!
Mother's Day isn't just a day we celebrate our own Mother's, it's also a day we celebrate MOTHER NATURE! Where better to celebrate, then where the four ancient elements Fire ( light), Earth ( the beach), Water ( the Ocean), and Air ( the Sky ) all join together seamlessly -- @ THE BEACH!
Saturday, May 09, 2009
WE WANT MORE NOW!!

Friday, May 08, 2009
OBAMA FUMBLES ON BEACH REPLENISHMENT!!
WHELAN BILL PROPOSES MAJOR SEAWARD EXPANSION IN AC !!

Thursday, May 07, 2009
HERE COMES THE SANDMAN

Wednesday, May 06, 2009
WAVES - BY CLARK LITTLE







They all speak for themselves! The sheer beauty of these shots is awe inspiring to anyone who loves the sea and the beach. The artistry and orginality is mind boggling, one wonders how did he get these shots? They almost look like surreal paintings not photos!
Tuesday, May 05, 2009
PRES. OBAMA - NO STIM. $$ FOR BEACHES
The Obama Admin. is standing firm in it's position that NO Stimulus $$ will be used for any Army Corp. beach projects. Marlowe and Co. thought they could use the economic emergency to get the new Admin. to ignore a 25 yr. old Executive branch precedent forbidding any Fed. $$ to be allocated for Beach Projects. Today's Army Corp. Projects are all created by Congressional earmarks ( pork). It's no surprise that OMB has wisely kept the President out of this. Now Lobiondo and the rest will have to go back to begging each other for taxpayer $$ for these projects.Monday, May 04, 2009
MEXICO PREPARES TO RE-OPEN !!
Saturday, May 02, 2009
SWINE FLU LESS SERIOUS THEN 1ST THOUGHT!
100 yrs. HAPPY BIRTHDAY - MARGATE CITY 1909-2009
