Sunday, February 28, 2010
THE COFFEE REBELLION SPREADS!!
Saturday, February 27, 2010
PACIFIC TIDAL WAVE MAP!

BEACH REPORT:
Thursday, February 25, 2010
THE COFFEE CUP COALITION IS BORN!!!

It's Time for a Progressive Tea Party Movement
By Stephen Crockett
February 25, 2010
Take Action: Eat lunch for peace--become a "brown-bagger"

Published by t r u t h o u t.
Most progressives have little respect for the Fox News-generated "Tea Party" movement. However, it has tapped into a very real populist anger with the direction the country is headed in at this point in our history.
Progressives should see a real opportunity in the emergence of the "Tea Party" movement to educate the public and redirect the anger to the real villains whose actions and policies created the many problems faced by the citizens of the United States of America. Our government has failed the American public by serving corporate interests and private profit instead of the public good.
The Republican Right has been somewhat successful in twisting this legitimate anger and aiming it against those who have been fighting this corporate takeover and corruption instead of themselves. They do this by lying to the public and twisting reality.
Of course, Fox News has been the leading force in this evil propaganda campaign. However, a few corporatist Democrats like Sen. Ben Nelson, Independents like Joe Lieberman and almost every elected Republican in the nation have helped advance the corporatist agenda by deceiving the reformist elements in the Tea Party movement.
Tea Party activists should realize that Fox News was formed by corporatists to advance the corporatist agenda. The corporatists have captured the "conservative" movement. They are playing their followers for suckers. A few Tea Party leaders know they are being used as a tool of the Republican Right and corporatists, but most do not.
The American government is not the enemy if it is actually controlled by the American public instead of by the rich and powerful elite who make up the corporatists' power structure. The American government needs to provide a check and balance against corporate power. We must recapture our government from corporate interests. This will never be done by Republicans. It will never be done by the small corporatist faction of the Democratic Party. It can be done with an alliance of progressives, real Tea Party reformers, economic populists and grassroots Democrats.
The Scott Browns and Sarah Palins of the nation only play at being populists. They act in support of the corporatist agenda while talking like reformers. Scott Brown was financed by corporatist forces. He was heavily financed by the debt collection industry, banking interests, health insurance companies and the like, just like Sarah Palin. Brown opposes Wall Street reforms and regulation. He wants corporate power to go unchecked. These ideas are clearly enemies of the American public and real functional democracy. Folksy talk is just more hot air. It is actions that count.
Fox News seems designed to act as a financial and political backer of Republican Right corporatist politicians. They spin everything to defeat real reforms and undermine real reformers.
Labor unions act as a check and balance on corporate power. Fox News and the Republican Right corporatists demonize them at every opportunity. Union leaders are always elected by the membership. They are the only truly democratically elected populist element in our economic system. The Fox News crowd calls these elected leaders "union bosses." You do not get to elect your "boss." Try suggesting free elections for all the management positions at your place of employment and you will probably be joining the ranks of the unemployed. Corporations are basically organized in a top-down dictatorial manner. It is their nature and mindset to be dictatorial with very, very few exceptions.
Suing corporations acts as a check and balance to corporate power. Fox News and the Republican Right corporatists are trying to eliminate the effectiveness of this check and balance under the disguise of "tort reform."
Campaign finance laws slightly reduced the ability of corporations to buy elections, smear reformers and defeat reforms. While in power, the Republican Right corporatists packed all our federal courts with corporatists. This is why the Republican Right corporatists on the Supreme Court recently overturned over 60 years of established law to give corporations unlimited power to spend shareholders' money to advance their corporatist political goals.
Most corporations are not loyal American citizens as the recent Supreme Court ruling implies. Almost all the large corporations operating in America are international in nature. International corporations should not be controlling the American economy, the American political system or the American government. American citizens should be. No matter what the Supreme Court says, international corporations are neither people nor American citizens.
The percentage of the American economy going toward debt is growing rapidly. Why? The answer is corporate power and corporatist government policy. So-called "free trade" has failed the American public while enriching the corporatists. Tax revenue has gone into the toilet because we do not tax imports and tens of millions of former taxpayers have lost their jobs. Without good-paying jobs, these workers/taxpayers are not paying nearly as much in taxes.
Tax cuts for over 30 years have been focused on enriching the corporatists and screwing the middle classes. The Fox News and the Republican Right corporatists want you to place the blame on the poor for government debt. This is pure nonsense. Unfair tax cuts are the real villains along with corporatist "free trade" policies. Additionally, the corporatists start unnecessary wars financed by public debt that enrich the international corporations while killing and maiming American soldiers.
So-called "free trade" is undermining our national security by crushing our industrial manufacturing base and crippling our national finances.
Government spending as a percentage of our economy is excessively large mostly because our economy has not really grown the way it should because of so-called "free trade." Free trade has not been free for American citizens. Our public and personal debts have exploded. Our wages have not grown as quickly as our cost of living. Our jobs are disappearing or have already disappeared.
Government debt to enrich international corporations instead of improving the lives of American citizens is nearly criminal. Why does Medicare money get paid to drug companies without bargaining down the price of drugs? Corporate power is the only answer.
Why do Americans pay twice as much for medical care as in any other industrialized nation, but have worse results? Why are medical costs exploding here at the same time as millions of citizens are being kicked out of their health insurance plans? Why are our companies paying the cost of health insurance while all our foreign competitors get subsidized by government payment of health care costs? The answers are corporate power.
The real reformers of the Tea Party movement need to look at corporate power instead of government as the villains threatening the future of America. The Republican Right, corporatists and Fox News are threatening your civil liberties and Constitutional Rights, not the ACLU, Obama or the Democratic Party. The Republican Right, corporatists and Fox News are those who support the "national security state," torture, jailing citizens without trial, wiretapping without court orders, etc.
International corporate interests have much more control over the lives of the average American citizens than our government does. When the government gets captured by these corporations, as it did under George W. Bush and his allies who are still in office, the American public gets hammered!
You are not ignorant or out of touch with reality just because you watch Fox News or listen to right-wing talk radio, but prolonged exposure will eventually get you there. Watching only Fox News will likely stop reform supporters of the Tea Party movement from realizing that they have much more in common with progressives than they ever knew. The real reformers in the Tea Party movement and progressives should unite in a Progressive Tea Party movement. Fox News and the Republican Right corporatists should not control or define the Tea Party. Both progressives and the real reform elements in Tea Party movement should reach out to each other and make common cause on many issues.
It is time for a Progressive Tea Party movement.
READ ABOUT US NOW POSTED @ the 2nd largest Progressive blog in America Firedoglake!! Click on the title link NOW!!
Wednesday, February 24, 2010
Multiple sexual harassment lawsuits filed against Harrah’s Atlantic City Casino Hotel
At least 13 sexual harassment lawsuitshave been filed against Harrah’s Resort in Atlantic City. The company management has also been accused of trying to cover up the harassment and retaliating against employees who complained about the hostile work environment.
The lawsuits accuse former supervisor Raymond Montgomery, who served as the “Director of Nightlife” at Harrah’s The Pool nightclub, of making sexual advances on numerous female employees and pressuring them to drink excessive amounts of alcohol. Two of the women allege that they blacked out and later discovered that they had been sexually assaulted by Montgomery.
Another Harrah’s boss, Jeffrey Chafee, was named in the lawsuits. Chafee was accused by a female employee of subjecting her to “inappropriate, vulgar, and off-color comments, innuendos, and jokes.” According to the complaint, the woman was retaliated against and accused of “insubordination” after she reported Chafee’s behavior to Harrah’s HR department.
Two human resources managers, Mylka Naranjo and Tim Kreischer, were named in the lawsuit complaints for failing to try to stop the harassment. Naranjo is alleged to have told a woman who complained to her to “Stop being a baby,” and Kreischer is accused of engaging “in a concealment and cover-up of such instances of sexual harassment and the creation of a hostile work environment in the workplace in order to prevent wrongdoing of co-employees, supervisory and managerial level employees from being exposed.”
Sunday, February 21, 2010
Saturday, February 20, 2010
THE JOB MACHINE IS BROKEN
Today's AC Press leads off with a story ( @ the title link) about local towns having to lay off Police and other workers. As the Great Recession deepens and tax revenues in many states, counties and towns and cities continue to decline these types of lay-offs will increase and the spiral down will deepen further. Last yrs. Federal stimulus created few private jobs, no matter what the Obama people say. It mostly just padded Gov't payrolls and forestalled the inevitable. Without, job creation in the private sector there isn't going to be the $$ available to maintain the existing public sector as time goes on. People who work for Gov't must understand the two situations are linked in a very direct way. Nobody wants to see anybodies job disappear, but it's absurd to think it's not going to happen to people working for the Gov't simply because they work for the Gov't. Nobody's job is secure anymore. Friday, February 19, 2010
NJ TO BAN SMOKING ON PUBLIC BEACHES

Bills would ban smoking on NJ's beaches
Posted: Thursday, February 18, 2010 | 1 comment
Smoking might be banned at beaches, amusement parks and racetracks in New Jersey.
A state Senate committee on Thursday will consider consolidating three bills that would expand retrictions already imposed by some Jersey shore towns.
State Sen. Andrew Ciesla (SEES'-la) of Ocean County wants to prohibit smoking on state-owned beaches.
Sens. Barbara Buono of Middlesex County and Loretta Weinberg of Bergen County would ban smoking at state- and municipal-owned beaches and parks.
Sen. Shirley Turner of Mercer County would ban smoking on beaches and other public places, such as racetracks and amusement parks.
If the committee approves the combined bill, the full Senate could vote on the measure as early as Monday.
Posted in NEW JERSEY on Thursday, February 18, 2010 6:25 am
NJ is taking steps to ban smoking on it's public beaches. I'm not sure how I feel about this one. I don't smoke but this law might be over the top.
Tuesday, February 16, 2010
WILL THEY EVER LEARN??

Monday, February 15, 2010
RUNAWAY TRAIN
Sunday, February 14, 2010
Saturday, February 13, 2010
BEACH REPORT:

Friday, February 12, 2010
SCIENCE FRI: - CLIMATE & WEATHER

Thursday, February 11, 2010
Ex-Ventnor Mayor Tim Kreischer back in the news!

Harrah’s not only tolerated sexual harassment but covered it up, alleges a new set of lawsuits against the casino.
Two workers filing those suits are the first to make allegations that go beyond The Pool nightclub and since-fired manager Raymond Montgomery, who is the target of 13 lawsuits that have been filed since November.
Until now, Montgomery was allegedly the sole aggressor in the accusations, although the casino, its leaders and several Human Resources employees were accused of allowing the harassment to continue. Harrah’s has responded by saying as soon as they were made aware of the allegations an investigation was conducted and Montgomery was terminated. He has refused to comment.
But now, two of three suits filed last week allege the environment of harassment existed outside of the water-themed club and Montgomery. And those who were supposed to implement the policies meant to protect employees instead allowed harassment to continue, the suits allege.
One woman says she was working in a parking garage bathroom June 18, 2005, when a co-worker who had been harassing her came in and sexually assaulted her. The woman — whose name is being withheld due to the nature of the charges — reported the incident to police, and received workers’ compensation as a result. No one was arrested in the case, even though police confirmed both the woman and the man she accused are named in the report.
The suit claims she never pursued charges because relatives of the man — who also worked at the casino — intimidated her. When she reported the relatives to Mylka Naranjo in Human Resources, she was told: “Stop being a baby,” according to the suit.
At one point, she charges, she was even assigned to work with the men whom she had reported were harassing her. The hostile work environment allegedly continued to at least this past December.
Bridgeton-based attorney Thomas Seeley, who said he has 20 plaintiffs so far, believes some workers were afraid to come forward until seeing that others have.
“What I think may be happening, is some other workers are saying, ‘I’ve put up with this for years,’” he said.
While the suits claim several members of management ignored workers’ claims, Naranjo and manager Tim Kreischer were the most culpable, according to the claims. Both worked in Human Resources and were supposed to implement policies to maintain a non-hostile work environment, but instead they allowed it to continue unabated, the suits allege.
Kreischer — the former mayor of Ventnor — “further engaged in a concealment and cover-up of such instances of sexual harassment and the creation of a hostile work environment in the workplace in order to prevent wrongdoing of co-employees, supervisory and managerial level employees from being exposed,” the suit states.
Reached at his home, Kreischer referred all comment to Harrah’s. A telephone number could not be found for Naranjo.
“We’re not trying to create any type of feeling towards the casino or Harrah’s,” Seeley said. “We want to simply present the facts that we have and let a neutral fact-finder determine whether or not what Harrah’s has done is a violation of the law under sexual discrimination.”
Harrah’s spokeswoman Alyce Parker said the company has only received one of the three new lawsuits, and legal counsel is reviewing it.
She previously has said Harrah’s Entertainment has a zero tolerance policy when it comes to any form of harassment.
“Our policy encourages employees to bring such issues to our attention so that we can investigate and take appropriate action,” she has said.
Contact Lynda Cohen:
609-272-7257
LCohen@pressofac.com
Tuesday, February 09, 2010
SARAH PALIN USES A HAND-O -PROMPTER
| The Colbert Report | Mon - Thurs 11:30pm / 10:30c | |||
| Sarah Palin Uses a Hand-O-Prompter | ||||
| www.colbertnation.com | ||||
| ||||
Colbert's take on this RETARD masquerading as a Presidential candidate is hilarious.
Monday, February 08, 2010
MGM TO SELL IT'S 50% OF BORGATA

Saturday, February 06, 2010
EL NINO RETURNS

The strongest El Nino weather event in over a decade is now happening in the Pacific. The monumental snow storms hammering the Eastern US are a result of this event. The EL Nino will continue right into spring this yr. according to the article I've linked at the title page.
Friday, February 05, 2010
THE UGLY FACE OF "THE GREAT RECESSION"

Thursday, February 04, 2010
VOLCKER RULES

Volcker Rules
by Robert Scheer
Finally President Barack Obama has come to his senses on financial regulation. His endorsement of what he calls the “Volcker Rule” for once puts him squarely on the side of ordinary Americans as opposed to the banking bandits who have so thoroughly fleeced the public.
The proposal from former Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker basically involves restoring the spirit, if not the letter, of the 1930s Glass-Steagall banking regulations to prevent another Great Depression. It means separating the activities of commercial banks, entrusted with the deposits of ordinary folks, from the antics of the financial high rollers who are presumably dealing with wealthier and more knowledgeable investors. Commercial banks were intended to be heavily regulated and insured by the government to protect the savings of unwary citizens. Less risk-averse investors and the firms that handled their funds could fend for themselves, and if there was a collapse there would be no innocent victims requiring a government bailout.
This setup worked splendidly for more than six decades, until the rules were changed to permit the merger of the two types of banking activity, which never would have happened had President Ronald Reagan renamed Volcker as head of the Fed back in 1987. To reappoint Volcker would have been the logical move given his spectacular record in taming inflation, which he brought down to 3.6 percent after it had risen to 11.3 percent thanks to the energy crisis of 1979. Reagan went with Alan Greenspan instead because of their shared ideological fervor for unfettered free markets. But the repeal of Glass-Steagall required bipartisan support, and that eventually came with the presidency of Bill Clinton, who reappointed Greenspan and his fellow free-market ideologues Robert Rubin and Lawrence Summers to head the Treasury Department. They joined forces with the Wall Street lobby, and as a result Glass-Steagall was repealed in 1999 when Clinton signed the law eliminating it.
Unfortunately, and despite the collapse of the banking system brought about by the shenanigans of the “too big to fail” conglomerates permitted in the new deregulatory environment, Obama has wasted the last year and trillions of taxpayer dollars bailing out Wall Street without putting significant new rules in place to govern reckless behavior. Only now, with the economic disaster bankrupting the government, has he turned to Volcker for leadership. And in testimony Tuesday before the Senate Banking Committee, Volcker offered the essential justification for needed banking legislation:
“The basic point is that there has been, and remains, a strong public interest in providing a `safety net’—in particular, deposit insurance and the provision of liquidity in emergencies—for commercial banks carrying out essential services. There is not, however, a similar rationale for public funds-taxpayer funds—protecting and supporting essentially proprietary and speculative activities.”
Investment houses would still be permitted to play freely at the Wall Street casino, but they would have to pay the consequences of their own failure. In the event that the largest of them approached collapse, the government would still step in—not to save them but to dispose of the body in a way that did not endanger the health of others. As Volcker put it, when it would come to dealing with the impending collapse of an investment giant: “The mandate is to arrange an orderly liquidation or merger. In other words, euthanasia, not a rescue.”
Euthanasia was applied to Lehman Brothers but not Goldman Sachs, which was allowed to suddenly jump over the wall to become a commercial bank and thus eligible for TARP funding and many billions more from the government.
The biggest banks, whether originally commercial or investment banks, are now screaming their predicted pain at the prospect of new regulations—and no wonder. An analysis of the five top banks affected, led by Goldman Sachs, shows they stand to lose $13 billion in revenue next year if the proposed regulations pass, according to Bloomberg. But there is hope for at least some bipartisan support for the restoration of a wall separating these two very different sorts of banking activities, as indicated by a bill co-sponsored by Sens. John McCain, R-Ariz., and Maria Cantwell, D-Wash., to explicitly restore the safeguards of Glass-Steagall.
Please don’t let your eyes glaze over on this issue as a matter of arcane economic regulation. It’s the ballgame as far as breaking the death grip of Wall Street over our economy. The projected $1.6 trillion deficit is only the first installment on decades of crippling debt that will pile up because of the irresponsibility of a radically deregulated banking system. This should be the only reminder we need that little else matters in the way of public policy discussion as long as Wall Street bleeds us dry.
Robert Scheer is editor of Truthdig.com and a regular columnist for The San Francisco Chronicle.
Robert Scheer sums it up pretty good. We need to get these Vampires under control again or they'll gamble us all back into the ditch. Like most degenerate gamblers they cannot control themselves and the rest of us are tired of the Gov't using our taxes to enable them further.
Wednesday, February 03, 2010
BI-PARTISANSHIP TODAY
Think bi-partisanship is good for America? Its what were told day and night lately, but when the Gopers ruled funny thing you never heard them calling for this, did you? Read Cenk Uygur's excellent article on why this is and why so called bi-partisanship is really bad news for America these days. Read all about it @ the title link.
Tuesday, February 02, 2010
GROUNDHOGS DAY!!
Monday, February 01, 2010
Staring Back @ Van Gogh


