Follow by Email

Tuesday, March 29, 2011

ELECTION BLOG 2011


Ok, so back to Margate Muni elections for 2011.  Today is an open section for comments of any variety on this yrs. election. Who do you want to win and why? Who do you want to lose and why? What group ticket do you like or not like?  What issues do you think are going to dominate this years election? 

Saturday, March 26, 2011

BEACH REPORT:



The TWO Referendums

 There is a simple fact about Margate and referendums, when the powers to be @ City Hall want one to happen it does and when they don't, it somehow doesn't. I know this from experience because I was part of another group ( D.U.N.E.) that put together a petition for a referendum in Margate in the early yrs. of this century that resulted in an ordinance that sits on the Margate books to this day, one that requires a referendum be held in Margate if anyone in city Gov't tries to have Margate join a so called beach replenishment project, ones specifically that would require raising money through a bond or from using $$ directly from tax revenues. The so called Walsh act was never even brought up in this instance, why? Because they wanted this law and the Commission then passed it unanimously. If they hadn't they would have fought the petition to hold a referendum to enact it, they didn't. 

The Firehouse Renovation Referendum Petition

   That was then... Not so with the present referendum on the Firehouse renovations. The present referendum petition ( By The Concerned Citizens of Margate group) was vigorously opposed  ( by City Hall) to the point that those who rejected it had to fall back on what some might say were rather legalistic contortions ( invoking the Walsh Act to reject allowing a vote.) Quite the contrary happens it seems when a group raises a petition for something they ( City Hall)  want, as we found out. In the end it's to be seen whose going to pay the price for rejecting the present petition and for stopping the vote. I suspect it, if anyone does it probably will  be the two Commissioners Dan Campbell and Maury Blumberg who voted against it.  I'd like to add, that I personally thought it was rather hypocritical of Commissioner Blumberg to then show up on the steps of  City Hall a few mos. later and declare he was all for public referendums in these matters, especially in light of his having voted against this one just a few mos. earlier. Sometimes it's possible to have it both ways in such matters and sometimes its not. In this case the voters will have the final say in May.


 LOCAL 54 AGAINST REVEL

It appears two of my ideas have strong local support this week. Local 54 the largest Casino Union is against extending State tax credits to REVEL casino on the grounds it will damage the other Casinos now existing in AC causing massive lay offs maybe, even the closing of a few of the existing halls. I've been saying this very same thing here for years now. Revel is a dinosaur of a bygone era. Funding this place will not revive and save AC no matter what it's paid for cheerleaders are saying. You don't introduce a shark into a tank of starved and weakened guppies and then expect somehow miraculously for them all to survive and thrive. This is exactly the error we committed in the beginning of the gaming era and look at the result today?  AC is a trash heap topped by 11 weakening guppies, each of whom is trying to eat the other. Drop a big fat white shark ( REVEL) in and just watch the result.  

    
TRUMP PLAZA EXPERIMENTS WITH FREE PARKING - ITS WORKING !!

   On a brighter note, the new management at Trump Plaza has it seems taken my advice and dropped the parking fee for it's patrons. They've correctly realized that patrons shouldn't be unfairly taxed simply for parking. Imagine what would happen to any mall that did this. The State of  NJ laid on the stupid tax and has since stubbornly defended it, even as the competition has been increasingly eating us alive. The next thing that should happen is that the rest of the AC Casinos if they have half a brain would follow suit. With gas prices soaring and the Sugarhouse Casino and other Pa., Casinos a cab drive or subway ride away from so many possible AC patrons now,  we don't need to be penalizing potential customers for coming here. Dropping the price of the AC Xpressway tolls would also help.  Anyway, kudos go to the Trump Plaza Managers for employing a relatively easy and cheap way to attract customers back to their faltering Casino. Maybe, they're vision will lead the way to more such decisions.








Friday, March 25, 2011

THE NORTH SHORE @ 1000FPS !!




HAVE A WONDERFUL WEEKEND. WITH ALL THE BAD NEWS, WARS ETC. WE THOUGHT THIS SPECTACULAR VIDEO WOULD PUT A SMILE ON ALL YOUR FACES. ENJOY IT!

Thursday, March 24, 2011

IS THIS MARGATE'S FUTURE?

In California City, Layoffs for Nearly Half the Staff

Monica Almeida/The New York Times
Helen Nenadal, who has worked for the city of Costa Mesa, Calif., for more than 30 years, was one of hundreds of city workers to receive a pink slip.
COSTA MESA, Calif. —To solve a looming pension crisis and budget gap, city officials said, they needed to take drastic action. Now everyone agrees on one thing: they did.

Related

Monica Almeida/The New York Times
A memorial outside City Hall for Huy Pham, a maintenance worker who jumped from the building to his death after being laid off.
Nearly half of this city’s workers were told late last week that, come September, they would probably be out of a job. Nearly every city department will be eliminated. More than a dozen tasks will be outsourced, including graffiti removal, firefighting, building maintenance and street cleaning.
Unlike the drama that played out over several months in Madison, Wis., the battle over public workers in this bustling suburb of upscale shopping malls in the heart of Orange County is happening at lightning speed.
The letters went out last week to more than 200 of the city’s roughly 450 workers, sending many into a panic as they scurried to look for new jobs. The move will, in one great swoop, reinvent municipal government here, and perhaps lead the way for other cities to adopt similar plans.
Emotions in Costa Mesa, already running high, grew more intense after one city worker, summoned to receive his pink slip, instead climbed five stories to the roof of City Hall and jumped to his death. A small side entrance to the building is now decorated with supermarket bouquets and tall, white candles, a memorial to the 29-year-old man, who had worked for the city’s maintenance department for four years.
The layoffs have deeply divided this small city, just over the coast from affluent Newport Beach. While Costa Mesa has long been a politically conservative enclave, much like the other wealthy suburbs that surround it, the move to privatize so many city services strikes many residents as a harsh political tactic, meant to remake the city into a national model in the battle over public employee unions.
But the City Council, which moved quickly to approve the outsourcing and layoff plans, says the layoffs are the only way to solve a budget gap of as much as $15 million next year and deal with pensions that grow exponentially each year, eating away at the city’s $93 million budget.
“We see the train wreck coming and the only questions are how bad it will be and how quickly we want to try to stop it,” said City Councilman Jim Righeimer, who has led the push for outsourcing and has battled with public employee unions for years. “We have to stop blaming other people and start to solve these problems ourselves. These are hardworking people, but we know we cannot afford to keep paying what we have been.”
This is the Wisconsin labor battle in miniature — union officials and opponents of the layoffs say it is politics and not money that is driving the decision. City officials say they do not know how much money they will save by outsourcing, although Mr. Righeimer said he expected to cut anywhere from 15 to 40 percent in labor costs.
Mr. Righeimer, a real estate developer, has been a vocal irritant to unions for years, and he fought a bruising battle against them in his bid for the City Council here last fall. But few here seemed prepared for him to push such wholesale change so quickly. Several community leaders called this week for the city to rescind the layoff notices, although there were few signs that officials would back down.
“They should have been thinking from the very beginning what kind of cost saving they were going to get before doing this — not tell us now. ‘You don’t have a job, and we’ll get back to you later if we change our mind,’ “ said Helen Nenadal, who has worked in the city’s maintenance department for more than 30 years and who now believes the city will not back down on the plan. “They are on their mission,” she said.
City officials say the services could be outsourced to a mix of private firms and other municipal governments. The county’s fire department has indicated that it would be willing to take over the firefighting duties in Costa Mesa, as it has for other cities. The department said it could cover the city with 15 fewer firefighters, Mr. Righeimer said.
City officials have not ruled out outsourcing the police as well, one of the only city departments not included in this first round of layoffs. Although other employees, like city planners and engineers, may have avoided the pink slips for now, few feel confident that they will not be laid off later, what with a team of consultants considering cost savings in the entire city.
Wendy Leece, the only one of the five City Council members to vote against the layoffs, said her colleagues were acting “recklessly.”
“We’re a nice, safe and clean city, and we need to make sure we stay that way,” Ms. Leece said. “I’m a lifelong Republican — nobody can out-Republican me. But I think we also need to be conservative on the front end and not rush into something that is going to alienate all our employees.”
“The sky isn’t falling,” she added, “but there is a real effort by some to exaggerate the crisis.”
The city has already been through a round of cuts. Last year, it eliminated or reduced the hours for 77 employees and cut programs. Tom Hatch, the city’s chief executive, said the city currently had the same number of staff members as it did in 1985, “with a much higher demand of services.” And employees have offered some concessions, including paying more toward pensions.
But because so much of the city’s budget goes to paying salaries and benefits, there has been less money to spend on needed city services. Roads have gone unrepaired for too long and it has been years since there has been enough money to buy fertilizer for city parks, said Stephen Mensinger, who was appointed to the city council this year and is backing the outsourcing plan.
“At some point we don’t have money for anything else except for labor,” Mr. Mensinger said. “That can’t go on. We’re not a poor town, but we’ve been spending money without regard to whether it’s for the best possible services at the lowest possible price.”

I once lived in Costa Mesa , Calif  long ago.  Costa Mesa is to Newport Beach what Northfield is to Margate location wise.  Newport is a small very wealthy Calif. Coastal town on a small peninsula of  sandy  beaches and bays.  Costa Mesa is  right across a connecting bridge from Newport.  This is an extremely conservative area of Calif. so I'm not that surprised that were seeing such a radical solution to a budget problem  there.   Could this be Margate someday?  There are more then a few people in town right now that firmly believe Margate's City Administration is  way over staffed and way to costly. What do you folks think?

Wednesday, March 23, 2011

Back in Black !!



This is a crack up.

ELECTION 2011

MARGATE, IS IT A BUSINESS ?

   My more conservative friends and associates often tell me they would prefer if  Gov'ts were ran more like a business. Another favorite metaphor they like is about how Gov't should learn to be more like a family when it comes to budgets.  I have my serious doubts that either of these two metaphors really work very well in the case of Gov'ts. Today's question for everyone then is should Margate be run like a business or a family? Sometimes , it seems the family part ( down @ Margate City Hall)  is already part of the equation in more ways then one. As for the business metaphor, what do you think? I know I shudder when I think of City Hall being run like ENRON or AIG as examples. 

Tuesday, March 22, 2011

LIBYA - ME WAR No. 3


Libya: A War We Shouldn't Believe In

U.S. forces fired 110 cruise missiles at Libya on the first day of the war. Each one cost $755,000 to build; $2.8 million to transport, maintain and shoot. Austerity and budget cuts abound; there's no money for NPR or teachers or firefighters. Note to union negotiators: the government has lots of money. They're spending it on war.

For people too young to remember Bosnia, this is what a violent, aggressive, militarist empire looks like under a Democratic president. Where Bush rushed, Obama moseys. No one believed ex-oil man Bush when he said he was out to get rid of the evil dictator of an oil-producing state; Obama, the former community organizer, gets a pass under identical circumstances. Over the weekend, also the eighth anniversary of the start of the Iraq quagmire, there were few protests against Obama's Libya War, all poorly attended.

I spent the weekend in New York at LeftForum, an annual gathering of anti-capitalist intellectuals. "What do you think about Libya?" people kept asking. What passes for the Left is ambivalent.

In part this waffling on Libya is due to Obama's deadpan (read: uncowboy-like) tone. Mostly, however, the tacit consent stems from televised images of ragtag anti-Qadafi opposition forces getting strafed by Libyan air force jets. We Americans like underdogs, especially when they say they want democracy.

Still, the President is not a dictator. He can't declare war. And while he might be able to lie his way into one, he and his party will pay at the polls if he fails to explain why we're attacking a nation that poses no threat to the United States.

There are a lot of questions we--and journalists--should be asking Obama. Obviously, we're broke. Our military is overextended, losing two wars against the people of Afghanistan and Iraq. How can we afford this?

Also:

1. Whom are we helping?

The U.S. and its allies are destroying Libya's air force in order to tip the balance in the civil war in favor of anti-Qadafi forces. A similar approach, aerial bombardment of Afghan government defenses, allowed Northern Alliance rebels to break through Taliban lines and enter Kabul in 2001. It could work again in Libya.

But who are these anti-Qadafi forces? Rival tribes? Royalists? Radical Islamists? What kind of government will they establish if they win? What are their ideological and religious affiliations? If anyone in the media or the White House knows, they're not telling.

Or perhaps, as in Iraq, the White House doesn't have a governance plan for post-Qadafi Libya. Which, as in Iraq, could lead to chaos. No nation should go to war without considering the long-term consequences.

Before we pick sides in a conflict, shouldn't we know for whom we are going billions of dollars further into debt?

2. Does Qadafi have the right to defend himself?

From Shea's Whiskey Rebellion to Confederacy to the Red Scares to the Black Panthers and the Weathermen, the U.S. government has violently suppressed armed rebellions. How then can the U.S. claim moral authority to prevent other governments from doing the same thing? ("The U.S. is more moral than Libya" is not an acceptable response. Obama murders and tortures more people than Qadafi.)

3. What about self-determination?

If the Libyan people rise up and overthrow Qadafi, an authoritarian despot well past his expiration date, that's great. Shouldn't that struggle be a Libyan matter, to be settled between Libyans? Isn't a government that emerges from indigenous internal struggle more likely to enjoy widespread support than one that results from outside intervention?
"Free men set themselves free," said James Oppenheim. Can a people truly feel emancipated when they owe their freedom--and later, inexorably, their oil and gas--to a foreign superpower?

4. Why are we OK with some dictators, but not others?

Since the Middle East began blowing up we've heard a lot of talk about Obama's dilemma: How do we reconcile American values with American strategic interests? In a good country--at least a non-hypocritical one--they are the same.

Obama is employing circular logic. "Why strike only Libya, when other regimes murder their citizens too?" asks Chris Good in The Atlantic Monthly. "Obama's answer seems to be: because the UN Security Council turned its attention toward Libya, and not other places." But the UN reacted in response to the U.S.

In other words: We're agreeing to a request that we made ourselves.

Ideology and policy must be consistent to be credible. If we have a policy to depose dictators, then all dictators must be targeted. We can't just take out those in countries with lots of oil. We ought to start with tyrants for which we bear responsibility: our allies and puppets. At this writing the U.S. supports or props up unpopular authoritarian regimes in Saudi Arabia, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Jordan, Yemen, and elsewhere.

5. Is Libya our geostrategic business?

The United States has no substantial historical ties with, innate cultural understanding of, or geographic proximity to, Libya. Even under the imperialist doctrine of "spheres of influence" that governed international relations during the Cold War, Libya falls under the purview of other would-be interventionists. Italy, and to a lesser extent Britain and France, are former colonial masters. The Arab League and African Union have interests there. Even if you buy the sentimental argument--"Are we going to stand by and watch Qadafi slaughter his own people?"--why us? Why not the Africans or Europeans?

Saturday, March 19, 2011

BEACH REPORT:


MARGATE COMMISSION ELECTIONS UNDERWAY

Margate's Commission elections are officially underway with 13 candidates running for the 3 brass rings ( AKA Commissioners seats). 9 of the candidates are teamed up into 3 tickets and the remaining 4 candidates are running alone. Here @ the Beach we've also started our election section. We'll eventually be presenting all the candidates a list of questions that we'll then post here. If you have a particular question you'd like for us to ask them, please send in to us here by emailing to: athebeach949@gmail.com and we'll add it to our list of possible questions to be used. The questions are for all the candidates to answer, so make sure your question is one they all can answer, don't send in one's focused on a particular candidate or ticket. 

Super MOON tonight!!

If you take a look at the full moon rising  around 7:30 pm this evening  it might appear unusually large because of a rare astronomical event. ( occurring about once every 20 yrs.) The Moon will be full at precisely the moment it reaches it's closest approach to the Earth, add to this the well known effect of the Horizon amplifying it's size like a lens and you'll see a rare event where the moon is literally almost 20% larger then normal. If your away from the coast an even more interesting thing could occur. For a reason unknown to scientists when the full moon is viewed with objects like trees or buildings in the way it appears even LARGER! This is a perceptual phenomenon that has been observed and known about all through history, but never fully understood by science. So if you have a free moment today at sunset look to the eastern horizon for a rare view of the Super moon.

NUKES  OUT OF CONTROL

Of course the really BIG story this week is the continuing aftermath of the huge earthquake / tsunami in Japan a week ago. The nuclear reactors at Fukishima along the coast where the tsunami crashed onshore are still out of control and in some kind of semi-meltdown mode and spreading radioactivity now far and wide. Hundreds of thousands of people are being evacuated in a 20 mile circle around the plant and the Japanese are desperately trying anything and everything to get this disaster under control, with little success at this juncture. It reminds me somewhat of last springs OIL well gusher disaster in the Gulf a yr. ago. On top of that is the ongoing relief effort involving the after effects of the tsunami that has made many more tens of thousands homeless. Add to their ( the Japanese' misery the Yen is also melting down on Int'l currency markets as a result of this triple calamity).  Talk about adding insult to injury, we also had loudmouth radio scumbag Rush Limbaugh purposely mocking the Japanese people during all of this for his own political agenda.  Rush wins our "how low can u go award" this week for his awful compassion-less comments. Glenn Beck took second for trying to blame reform Jews for something or other the week before. 


Friday, March 18, 2011

SCIENCE FRI: - The JAPANESE NUKES - NY TIMES EDITORIAL

EDITORIAL

Early Questions After Japan


Related - 
As Japan’s nuclear crisis unfolds, nations around the world are looking at the safety of their nuclear reactors — as they should. But most are also waiting until all the facts are in before deciding whether or how to change their nuclear plans. The Obama administration has vowed to learn from the Japanese experience and incorporate new safety approaches if needed.

Readers' Comments

That makes sense to us — so long as there is rigorous follow-through. The operator of the stricken plant, the Tokyo Electric Power Company, and the Japanese government have been disturbingly opaque about what is happening at the Fukushima Daiichi complex and about efforts to prevent a meltdown and the potential public threat.
That has deepened anxieties in Japan and around the world and led the United States government to take the extraordinary step of announcing that the damage to at least one of the crippled reactors may be far worse than Tokyo had admitted — and urging Americans there to move further away from the official safety perimeter.
Still, enough is known to begin raising questions about our own nuclear operations. We hope regulators and industry leaders are equally forthcoming about this country’s vulnerabilities and challenges.
One of the first questions is whether current evacuation plans are robust enough. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission requires plant operators to alert the public within a 10-mile radius if a dangerous plume of radioactivity will be heading their way, and local officials decide whether to order an evacuation. The American Embassy in Japan, based on advice from Washington regulators, has told Americans there to evacuate to a radius of about 50 miles from the Fukushima plant.
Why wouldn’t a worst-case accident here merit the same caution? The difficulty, of course, is that some plants — including Indian Point north of New York City — are within 50 miles of millions of people. Regulators will need to clarify this discrepancy or start coming up with more ambitious evacuation plans.
Regulators need to immediately review their safety analyses of two California plants, which, like the Fukushima plant, are located on the coast and near geological faults and might theoretically face the double calamity of an earthquake and tsunami.
The type of reactors used at the Fukushima plant — made by the General Electric Company, they are known as Mark 1 boiling-water reactors — have long been known to have weak containment systems. In Japan, they appear to have been ruptured by explosions of escaping hydrogen. American regulators will need to determine whether similar reactors in this country are vulnerable and whether modifications in newer versions have made them sufficiently safe.
The stricken Japanese complex housed six reactors in close proximity; explosions, fires and radiation spread damage among four of them and has made rescue efforts harder. Regulators will need to look at whether American nuclear plants with multiple reactors are vulnerable to the same cascading effects. In recent days, a new danger has emerged in the spent fuel pools adjacent to the reactors. At least one has apparently lost its cooling water and another is cracked and possibly losing water. If the fuel catches fire, it could spew radiation over a large area. Regulators here may need to expedite the removal of some spent fuel from pools to dry storage in casks.
So far, the all-important lesson would seem to be: have sufficient emergency power at hand to keep cooling water circulating in the reactors to prevent a meltdown.
The Japanese reactors seem to have survived one of the most powerful earthquakes ever recorded without major structural damage. The crisis developed because the plant lost electrical power from the grid and the tsunami knocked out its backup diesel generators. American regulators must ensure that all nuclear plants have enough mobile generators or other backup power in place if their first two lines of defense are disabled.

Thursday, March 17, 2011

FOLLOW BY E-MAIL

   @ The Beach has added a new feature to make it easier for those of you that would like to be informed by e-mail when the latest new content has been added to the site. This feature is right under the title header. Just add an e-mail address in the window provided  and click on submit.

WE DON'T SEE YOUR E-MAIL ADDRESS !!

I just received a comment by someone worried that if they submit their e-mail  we'll  have it and know who they are and they like being anonymous.  We don't ever see anyone's e-mail address folks! It's all handled by Google and they DO NOT send us a list of e-mails. Your e-mail then is anonymous to us. You are giving it to Google however.

NEW COMMENTS RULES: PLEASE READ BEFORE COMMENTING ON A POST!!

                                   
Comments Rules:


   For those of you that want to come here and spread libelous material forget about it. Comment moderation means no one will be seeing a comment unless we approve of it. We will not approve of comments that promote violence, or that promote or condone racial, ethnic or religious prejudice. We will also not publish comments that are filled with profanity. No commercial adds or comments trying to sell products or services will be allowed either. Direct attacks on the sites editors and owner will also obviously not be published.


Further comments on the comments


  We also suggest that you keep your comments to the subject at hand. Random comments that are totally unrelated to the subject or subjects being discussed might or might not be published as well. Remember @ the Beach is a PRIVATE Blog so your rights to say what you want here are entirely up to us. We do not however editorialize with your comments and unlike some local papers we do not alter your comments. We either allow them to be published or not. Also, please do not confuse publication with our approval of what you have to say. The site's policy is that we DO NOT approve or disapprove of your comments simply because we are allowing it to be seen.  We are receiving e-mails where folks are confusing  publication with approval. Let this be clear, this is a politically oriented blog and that implies some rough and tumble is going to take place here, harsh things are said in politics as we all know, but these kinds of comments, as long as they stay within the political context we are promoting are fair game. We highly suggest to all of you that might disagree vigorously with something that is said in a comment or a site post to come in and make your own comment in reply. Let the debate begin.

Wednesday, March 16, 2011

ELECTION 2011 - WHO OWNS MARGATE?


WHO OWNS MARGATE?

We've  started to receive campaign literature in the mail this week and on one of the pieces was a curious phrase about who owns Margate.  Having seen hundreds and hundreds of these kinds of fliers over the course of the decades this struck me actually as kind of odd. Was the ownership of the town ever in question before?  Is it now, I found myself wondering? This idea then set the mental tone for me the rest of the day and got me really thinking about it at a deeper level and here's why I think this question is possibly going to be a central theme of this election.


The Three Power groups

Ok, so here's how I see this question.  There are three fairly obvious groups with power in Margate. The first are of course the voters ( I'm not sure how many there are at any given time), but lets say they are somewhere in the 3 to 4 thousand range in a  population of yr. round residents of just over 6,000 ( this fig. from the 2010 census), then there are the taxpayers ( a far larger group and although I expect it's probably in the tens of thousands I don't have that fig.) The final group are approx 150 people who are the employees of Margate City ( again This isn't an exact fig, but I think it's close enough.) So, which one or which combination of these groups owns Margate is the question  being asked? 

The SHOOBIES

Ok, so we know for a fact that most of the owners of the private property that constitutes Margate ( mostly homes and business and some open land) are not "local" voting residents. So, you could say this group literally speaking owns most of Margate and you would  be kind of correct, except that even though  this group pays the lion share of the local taxes they don't have squat to say about who gets elected ( at least not directly by their votes). How much do they contribute to the campaigns being waged here is certainly an interesting question though?  So, do they own Margate by controlling the Commissioners through campaign donations?  It's hard to say for sure but, I don't think they do. Although, interestingly these folks might hold the title to most of the town legally, they probably have the least to say about how it's run and where it's heading.


The  Resident Voters (the LOCALS)

The next group are the voters, most of whom are also landowners and taxpayers and some of which are more transient renters. Does this group own Margate? They do it could be argued elect the Commission, so they do have some claim to the elected part of the power structure that's for sure. For all that's worth. But, does that constitute ownership of Margate? Not quite. Actually, not even close. Although it's true we get to pick candidates for the Commission every four yrs., we have to remember that it wasn't that long ago that these elections were almost a sick local joke, where the same deeply entrenched group ran the town for over 35 yrs. and nobody had the nerve to challenge them. In fact it wasn't till the late 90's that someone did, a retired long time Margate Policemen Ed McMeekin. ( much to his credit.) So, no the local voters don't in fact own Margate, they in my opinion own a partial say in how Margate is run, but sorry to say it appears an increasingly small say in reality. ( witness the recent failure of a local Citizen group to get a referendum on the ballot for an extremely contentious issue, even after raising over 600 legitimate voters signatures!) Ownership certainly would have warranted this at a min.


The City Administrators & Employees ( CITY HALL)

   The final group is in my estimate the most interesting for more then a couple of reasons.  Although tiny in nos. this group it could be said  lays claim to a major share of the tax revenue collected in Margate.  This money goes directly to this small but powerful group, as payroll, benefits etc.  This group is interestingly  a mix of some "local" residents and others that are not local residents with some of these non-local people holding extremely powerful positions of power.  It could also be argued that by being in these positions in some cases for decades these folks wield more direct day to day authority and power then the elected Commissioners, the voters and the tax payers put together. But, does this constitute "ownership?" The answer I've come up with is maybe it does in some very important and interesting ways.  It could be, that maybe just maybe this largely unelected and semi-permanent group has come to wield far more power then anybody ever envisioned when Margate was incorporated more then a century ago and that it's this gradual shift of power away from the elected representatives of the voters and the voters themselves toward the town's so called "professional day to day managers" that is causing much of the gradually increasing  dissension in the community. I could be wrong about this, but just the fact that one of the candidates has chosen to use this phrase about "ownership" certainly points to some kind of disconnect happening inside the community in this regard. 

So who do you think really OWNS Margate?

I'd like to hear back from the rest of you about this question.  How do you feel about this question of "who owns Margate?" Who do you think owns it or owns it's resources? Who do you think owns the largest share of power and authority over the towns property, income and other resources? Who in the final analysis do you think really owns Margate?






Monday, March 14, 2011

ELECTION 2011

Today is the last day candidates can register to run in Margate's Commission race. As of today  thirteen candidates  are running. Two more joined the fray sometime last week. I've listed the field below.


Bracketed - Reale-Rush-Canuso
Bracketed : Blumberg-Turner-Campbell
Bracketed : Becker-Taube-Pizagno
Single : Nigro
Single : Hiltner
Single : Vicharelli
Single : Swift

   Needless to say democracy is alive and well, at least in Margate. There was a time not that long ago that the Commission races were merely pro-forma events where every four years  the sitting Commission would run unopposed. Some people would I'm sure like to return to those days, but I  think for the foreseeable future the present scenario is more likely. If you have any comments please post them  here using the comments button below. If you'd like to submit a question to be published for everyone else to comment on as we go forward, please send it to athebeach949@gmail.com and we'll check it out and even possibly post it.
   I have a request for all of you that are Margate residents and voters and are on my mailing list. Please forward the blog address to those folks on your own address lists that are Margate voters who might be interesting in what were doing here. Thanks!

Sunday, March 13, 2011

MARGATE COMMISSION ELECTION 2011



   Welcome to Election 2011 for Margate's  3 Commission Seats to be held the second Tues. on May 10th. Starting tomorrow and right through to the election @ the Beach will be posting an election section for those people who want to make comments online about the candidates or issues in this race. If you want to have a particular question posted for everyone to comment on please send them in to this e-mail address athebeach949@gmail.com  All questions will be considered and all comments will also be considered by the site administrator. Please keep your questions brief and about the election. All comments will be moderated and anything that even looks like libel will be rejected.  Any attacks on this site will of course will be rejected. @ the Beach will not as a matter of policy be endorsing any candidates for election. We will however continue to make statements in regards to City policies and actions, as well as, general political topics regarding this election.

Saturday, March 12, 2011

BEACH REPORT:




Bad day to be @ the Beach in Japan

Needless to say the really big news this week was the huge earthquake and tsunami in Japan. Once again we were all shown how nature in the blink of an eye can change everything. With two damaged Nukes in dire straits as I write this, the second act of this disaster might just be starting.

Beach Replenishment funds cancelled for AC

Our GOP Congressman Frank Lobiondo couldn't it appears get a dime for beach replenishment projects from Congress this winter,  including AC's. AC has gone over 7 yrs. now without a refill. Enjoying our 50 yr. contract are we?  Where does this leave AC for the future with this project? Maybe we should ask Gov. Christie now since he's the new Mayor. Maybe the CRDA now that it has been designated the new City Council for half the town can fork over a few dollars to do the refill? Oh wait a minute, I forgot REVEL will probably need all that money. 

Margate's Commission Race getting ready for it's formal kick off on 3-14

With eleven candidates running so far, this coming Mon. is the deadline to sign up and the beginning of the race for all three Commission seats and the Mayor's office. At the end Tommy Hiltner,  Margate's long term City Clerk will crown the winners and then continue running things as usual. As for the locals, if they don't like it, as they say down @ city hall, you can always move somewhere else.










AFTERSHOCKS !!



This jumble of huge fishing boats that were tossed about like toys by the Tsunami yesterday should bring home the power of nature to everyone!!

Friday, March 11, 2011

SCIENCE FRI: - HUGE EARTHQUAKE , TSUNAMI - JAPAN

  
   A HUGE 8.9 Earthquake and a 30 ft. Tsunami struck Japan last evening killing hundreds and devastating hundreds of miles of Coast line. Click on the following link  to get the up to date reports and Videos  http://www.huffingtonpost.com/

Thursday, March 10, 2011

LoBIoNDo - "BEACH REPLENISHMENT IS ON HOLD!! "

"As for the Jersey Shore, LoBiondo said beach replenishment funding is on hold because earmark funding has been suspended. Earmark abuse put all projects in jeopardy, he said."


  Seems even the uber corrupt Corporatist GOP  Congress can't stomach pouring billions of  taxpayers dollars into the Oceans anymore.  That should tell you something about these projects. It seems bigger PIGS want that cash now so Weeks Marine and Great Lakes Dredging are going to have to go begging to the bankrupt States and local beach towns to cough up the billions they've come to demand as their due. The good times are over for this idea because as the new house speaker has so stridently put us on notice "We're broke!"  I guess when Frank went begging for sand dollars people just walked away. Oh well Frank, don't feel so bad you got away with this nonsense for almost two decades pal, but now it's over, at least for the time being. Read the whole story @ http://www.shorenewstoday.com/index.php/regional/cape-may-county/9565-lobiondo-slams-healthcare-tax-and-spend-policies.html

   REVEL already at sea!

   If I were the CEO at REVEL I'd be giving the Gov. a call on the phone asking whose going to either put an eternal beach in front of my building or a sea wall because right now in storms the Atlantic is literally washing up against your foundation already dude. Seems somebody didn't have the brains or good sense to force you fools to build that Blue Elephant at least 200 ft. back from the beach like I begged you to. Such friggin arrogance, it's sickening.