Follow by Email

Friday, December 30, 2011

SCIENCE FRI: - Gas heating vs. Oil heating

EarthTalk | Energy & Sustainability


Oil vs. Natural Gas for Home Heating: Which Costs More?
December 30, 2011 | 8
Share Email Print

Only eight percent of U.S. homes use oil heat today. Natural gas is both cheaper and has lower carbon emissions than oil, though it is still a fossil fuel and its green-friendliness is overstated. Most eco-advocates would rather see a shift to truly renewable heating sources like geothermal or solar.
Image: iStock/Thinkstock
Dear EarthTalk: Is it true that gas furnaces cost less to run and burn cleaner than their oil counterparts? If I make the switch, how long should I expect it to take for me to pay back my initial investment? And are there any greener options I should consider?
-- Veronica Austin, Boston, MA

It is true that natural gas has been a more affordable heat source than oil for Americans in recent years. The federal Energy Information Administration (EIA) reports that the average American homeowner will pay only about $732 to heat their home with gas this winter season (October 1 through March 31) versus a whopping $2,535 for oil heat. While the price of natural gas has remained relatively stable in the last few years, oil prices have been high and rising thanks in large part to continued unrest in Middle Eastern oil producing countries. Just two years ago the average winter home oil heating bill was $1,752.

While oil prices are likely to remain high and volatile in the foreseeable future, most energy analysts agree that pricing for natural gas, much of which is still derived domestically, is not expected to rise or fluctuate substantially in the U.S. any time soon. According to EIA economist and forecaster Neil Gamson, the U.S. already has a glut of natural gas and expects even more domestic production to come online soon as drillers are set to open up the Marcellus Shale in Pennsylvania and New York to more gas development.

Only about eight percent of U.S. homes are on oil heat today. Most are in the Northeastern U.S. and were built back in the day when oil was the cheapest way to keep toasty through the long winters. Many utilities have since put gas lines into neighborhoods that didn’t have them in the past, opening the door for homeowners to switch out old inefficient oil furnaces for more efficient gas units.

The federal government’s 30 percent tax credit (capped at $500) for upgrading to a high efficiency furnace expires at the end of 2011 but will likely be extended in one form or another into 2012. In the meantime, some states, municipalities and utilities offer their own incentives and low-interest loans on upgraded, high-efficiency furnaces. Check what’s available in your area via a zip code or map-based search online at the website of the Database of State Incentives for Renewables and Efficiency (DSIRE). Regardless of incentives, gas furnaces tend to cost less than their oil counterparts anyway, but installing one from scratch will incur an extra thousand dollars or two to run a gas line to it from the street. If natural gas continues to be substantially cheaper than oil, the fuel cost savings alone would pay back the up-front equipment and infrastructure investment within five years in most cases.

Environmentally speaking, gas has lower carbon emissions than oil, but hydraulic fracturing (“fracking”)—the highly controversial gas extraction method increasingly employed today (drillers inject water, sand and chemicals at high pressure underground to break through rock and access the natural gas)—takes a heavy toll on surrounding ecosystems and regional water quality. Most environmental advocates would rather see people transition to truly renewable heating sources like geothermal or solar. If you’re going to the cost and trouble of switching out an oil furnace for something new, a geothermal heat pump may cost more ($7,500 and up) than a new gas heating system but will save big bucks and emissions in the long run. For those in reliably sunny areas, a solar heating system will cost even more up front but can deliver similar long term economic and environmental benefits.

CONTACTS: EIA, www.eia.gov; DSIRE, www.dsireusa.org.

Monday, December 26, 2011

INSIDE JOB

Untitled from harisgr on Vimeo.



Take the time to watch this if you can. It's one of the best documentary's around detailing how the great crash of 2007-2008 actually happened and who were the central players.

Saturday, December 24, 2011

AN X-MAS MESSAGE FROM THE 1% !!


A Christmas Message From America's Rich

It seems America’s bankers are tired of all the abuse. They’ve decided to speak out.
True, they’re doing it from behind the ropeline, in front of friendly crowds at industry conferences and country clubs, meaning they don’t have to look the rest of America in the eye when they call us all imbeciles and complain that they shouldn’t have to apologize for being so successful.
But while they haven’t yet deigned to talk to protesting America face to face, they are willing to scribble out some complaints on notes and send them downstairs on silver trays. Courtesy of a remarkable story by Max Abelson at Bloomberg, we now get to hear some of those choice comments.
Home Depot co-founder Bernard Marcus, for instance, is not worried about OWS:
“Who gives a crap about some imbecile?” Marcus said. “Are you kidding me?”
Former New York gurbernatorial candidate Tom Golisano, the billionaire owner of the billing firm Paychex, offered his wisdom while his half-his-age tennis champion girlfriend hung on his arm:
“If I hear a politician use the term ‘paying your fair share’ one more time, I’m going to vomit,” said Golisano, who turned 70 last month, celebrating the birthday with girlfriend Monica Seles, the former tennis star who won nine Grand Slam singles titles.
Then there’s Leon Cooperman, the former chief of Goldman Sachs’s money-management unit, who said he was urged to speak out by his fellow golfers. His message was a version of Wall Street’s increasingly popular If-you-people-want-a-job, then-you’ll-shut-the-fuck-up rhetorical line:
Cooperman, 68, said in an interview that he can’t walk through the dining room of St. Andrews Country Club in Boca Raton, Florida, without being thanked for speaking up. At least four people expressed their gratitude on Dec. 5 while he was eating an egg-white omelet, he said.
“You’ll get more out of me,” the billionaire said, “if you treat me with respect.”
Finally, there is this from Blackstone CEO Steven Schwartzman:
Asked if he were willing to pay more taxes in a Nov. 30 interview with Bloomberg Television, Blackstone Group LP CEO Stephen Schwarzman spoke about lower-income U.S. families who pay no income tax.
“You have to have skin in the game,” said Schwarzman, 64. “I’m not saying how much people should do. But we should all be part of the system.”
There are obviously a great many things that one could say about this remarkable collection of quotes. One could even, if one wanted, simply savor them alone, without commentary, like lumps of fresh caviar, or raw oysters.
But out of Abelson’s collection of doleful woe-is-us complaints from the offended rich, the one that deserves the most attention is Schwarzman’s line about lower-income folks lacking “skin in the game.” This incredible statement gets right to the heart of why these people suck.
Why? It's not because Schwarzman is factually wrong about lower-income people having no “skin in the game,” ignoring the fact that everyone pays sales taxes, and most everyone pays payroll taxes, and of course there are property taxes for even the lowliest subprime mortgage holders, and so on.
It’s not even because Schwarzman probably himself pays close to zero in income tax – as a private equity chief, he doesn’t pay income tax but tax on carried interest, which carries a maximum 15% tax rate, half the rate of a New York City firefighter.
The real issue has to do with the context of Schwarzman’s quote. The Blackstone billionaire, remember, is one of the more uniquely abhorrent, self-congratulating jerks in the entire world – a man who famously symbolized the excesses of the crisis era when, just as the rest of America was heading into a recession, he threw himself a $5 million birthday party, featuring private performances by Rod Stewart and Patti Labelle, to celebrate an IPO that made him $677 million in a matter of days (within a year, incidentally, the investors who bought that stock would lose three-fourths of their investments).
So that IPO birthday boy is now standing up and insisting, with a straight face, that America’s problem is that compared to taxpaying billionaires like himself, poor people are not invested enough in our society’s future. Apparently, we’d all be in much better shape if the poor were as motivated as Steven Schwarzman is to make America a better place.
But it seems to me that if you’re broke enough that you’re not paying any income tax, you’ve got nothing but skin in the game. You've got it all riding on how well America works.
You can’t afford private security: you need to depend on the police. You can’t afford private health care: Medicare is all you have. You get arrested, you’re not hiring Davis, Polk to get you out of jail: you rely on a public defender to negotiate a court system you'd better pray deals with everyone from the same deck. And you can’t hire landscapers to manicure your lawn and trim your trees: you need the garbage man to come on time and you need the city to patch the potholes in your street.
And in the bigger picture, of course, you need the state and the private sector both to be functioning well enough to provide you with regular work, and a safe place to raise your children, and clean water and clean air.
The entire ethos of modern Wall Street, on the other hand, is complete indifference to all of these matters. The very rich on today’s Wall Street are now so rich that they buy their own social infrastructure. They hire private security, they live on gated mansions on islands and other tax havens, and most notably, they buy their own justice and their own government.
An ordinary person who has a problem that needs fixing puts a letter in the mail to his congressman and sends it to stand in a line in some DC mailroom with thousands of others, waiting for a response.
But citizens of the stateless archipelago where people like Schwarzman live spend millions a year lobbying and donating to political campaigns so that they can jump the line. They don’t need to make sure the government is fulfilling its customer-service obligations, because they buy special access to the government, and get the special service and the metaphorical comped bottle of VIP-room Cristal afforded to select customers.
Want to lower the capital reserve requirements for investment banks? Then-Goldman CEO Hank Paulson takes a meeting with SEC chief Bill Donaldson, and gets it done. Want to kill an attempt to erase the carried interest tax break? Guys like Schwarzman, and Apollo’s Leon Black, and Carlyle’s David Rubenstein, they just show up in Washington at Max Baucus’s doorstep, and they get it killed.
Some of these people take that VIP-room idea a step further. J.P. Morgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon – the man the New York Times once called “Obama’s favorite banker” – had an excellent method of guaranteeing that the Federal Reserve system’s doors would always be open to him. What he did was, he served as the Chairman of the Board of the New York Fed.
And in 2008, in that moonlighting capacity, he orchestrated a deal in which the Fed provided$29 billion in assistance to help his own bank, Chase, buy up the teetering investment firm Bear Stearns. You read that right: Jamie Dimon helped give himself a bailoutWho needs to worry about good government, when you are the government?
Dimon, incidentally, is another one of those bankers who’s complaining now about the unfair criticism. “Acting like everyone who’s been successful is bad and because you’re rich you’re bad, I don’t understand it,” he recently said, at an investor’s conference.
Hmm. Is Dimon right? Do people hate him just because he’s rich and successful? That really would be unfair. Maybe we should ask the people of Jefferson County, Alabama, what they think.
That particular locality is now in bankruptcy proceedings primarily because Dimon’s bank, Chase, used middlemen to bribe local officials – literally bribe, with cash and watches andnew suits – to sign on to a series of onerous interest-rate swap deals that vastly expanded the county’s debt burden.
Essentially, Jamie Dimon handed Birmingham, Alabama a Chase credit card and then bribed its local officials to run up a gigantic balance, leaving future residents and those residents’ children with the bill. As a result, the citizens of Jefferson County will now be making payments to Chase until the end of time.
Do you think Jamie Dimon would have done that deal if he lived in Jefferson County? Put it this way: if he was trying to support two kids on $30,000 a year, and lived in a Birmingham neighborhood full of people in the same boat, would he sign off on a deal that jacked up everyone’s sewer bills 400% for the next thirty years?
Doubtful. But then again, people like Jamie Dimon aren’t really citizens of any country. They live in their own gated archipelago, and the rest of the world is a dumping ground.
Just look at how Chase behaved in Greece, for example.
Having seen how well interest-rate swaps worked for Jefferson County, Alabama, Chase “helped” Greece mask its debt problem for years by selling a similar series of swaps to the Greek government. The bank then turned around and worked with banks like Goldman, Sachs to create a thing called the iTraxx SovX Western Europe index, which allowed investors to bet against Greek debt.
In other words, Chase knowingly larded up the nation of Greece with a crippling future debt burden, then turned around and helped the world bet against Greek debt.
Does a citizen of Greece do that deal? Forget that: does a human being do that deal?
Operations like the Greek swap/short index maneuver were easy money for banks like Goldman and Chase – hell, it’s a no-lose play, like cutting a car’s brake lines and then betting on the driver to crash – but they helped create the monstrous European debt problem that this very minute is threatening to send the entire world economy into collapse, which would result in who knows what horrors. At minimum, millions might lose their jobs and benefits and homes. Millions more will be ruined financially.
But why should Chase and Goldman care what happens to those people? Do they have any skin in that game?
Of course not. We’re talking about banks that not only didn’t warn the citizens of Greece about their future debt disaster, they actively traded on that information, to make money for themselves.
People like Dimon, and Schwarzman, and John Paulson, and all of the rest of them who think the “imbeciles” on the streets are simply full of reasonless class anger, they don’t get it. Nobody hates them for being successful. And not that this needs repeating, but nobody even minds that they are rich.
What makes people furious is that they have stopped being citizens.
Most of us 99-percenters couldn’t even let our dogs leave a dump on the sidewalk without feeling ashamed before our neighbors. It's called having a conscience: even though there are plenty of things most of us could get away with doing, we just don’t do them, because, well, we live here. Most of us wouldn’t take a million dollars to swindle the local school system, or put our next door neighbors out on the street with a robosigned foreclosure, or steal the life’s savings of some old pensioner down the block by selling him a bunch of worthless securities.
But our Too-Big-To-Fail banks unhesitatingly take billions in bailout money and then turn right around and finance the export of jobs to new locations in China and India. They defraud the pension funds of state workers into buying billions of their crap mortgage assets. They take zero-interest loans from the state and then lend that same money back to us at interest. Or, like Chase, they bribe the politicians serving countries and states and cities and even school boards to take on crippling debt deals.
Nobody with real skin in the game, who had any kind of stake in our collective future, would do any of those things. Or, if a person did do those things, you’d at least expect him to have enough shame not to whine to a Bloomberg reporter when the rest of us complained about it.
But these people don’t have shame. What they have, in the place where most of us have shame, are extra sets of balls. Just listen to Cooperman, the former Goldman exec from that country club in Boca. According to Cooperman, the rich do contribute to society:
Capitalists “are not the scourge that they are too often made out to be” and the wealthy aren’t “a monolithic, selfish and unfeeling lot,” Cooperman wrote. They make products that “fill store shelves at Christmas…”
Unbelievable. Merry Christmas, bankers. And good luck getting that message out.


MY TAKE:

    Our arrogant Aristocracy is how I read Matt's little X-Mas message from the Oligarchy. If anything of value has come from this fall's Occupy movement, as flawed as it was and is,  it was that it brought into sharp focus what had become starkly obvious to many of us out here for quite some time,  that our country and the World to some degree is now RULED by groups of people that literally no longer connect in any meaningful manner with the rest of their fellow humans on this planet. They've made it startling clear these last few decades that THEY are different then the rest of US. That their wealth sets them apart and gives them "the almost divine right" to do as they damn well please the rest of US ( the 99%) and the planet ( nature) be damned.  So keep in mind,  when this crowd  and their endless paid for shills and functionaries lecture us all on FREEDOM it's not about our freedom it's about their's to do with us and the physical planet as they please with absolutely no restrictions. 


NO LONGER DO THEY WANT TO BE SEEN AS MIDDLE CLASS!

The VELVET glove is off,  some of these folks have declared their utter contempt for the rest of us and in particular the so called "MIDDLE CLASS" of which they have now openly stated that  they do not any longer share many common interests , nor concerns. The old theory that a stable society needed a robust middle class has been effectively abandoned by these people. They, by their actions have made it eminently clear that they are much happier with a return to an America more like the one in the 18th and 19th Centuries, where there was three classes, but the middle classes were tiny in comparison to the middle classes of the mid-to late 20th century that many of us grew up in. In the "new " Normal" we are rapidly returning to a society with an enormous  working / poor class a tiny ruling class ( the 1%) and a small and shrinking  "middle class" made up of what will be left of the Unionized and Civil Service /  Public sector workforce and  the middle level managerial class and Professional classes ( Lawyers, Drs, Accountants , stock brokers etc.) of the middle and upper middle class. The big change from this 19th Century arrangement  is the massive Military and Intelligence apparatus  the American Empire now has. ( 800+ military bases world-wide.)  The 1% have made it clear they ONLY want to fund the MILITARY / INTELL. aspects of our Gov't going forward. To that end they want the old "New Deal " Social Welfare programs like SSI, Medicare and Unemployment Ins. among others de-funded and eventually ended or privatized ( handed over to Wall st. to gut and consume as it will.) In the article above Matt lays out their UTTER contempt for us in all it's angry and self-righteous indignation. They are essentially telling us TO EAT CAKE as their once Queen Maria Antoinette was heard to utter when told her subjects were starving in the streets. The Irony is, she actually meant feed them, we have an abundance and history misinterpreted her statement, but today's Royals are clear on this point , they want us to EAT a SHIT Sandwich and if we don't like it,  we can all GO to Hell !
    

2012 -The Presidential Campaign

  In the coming year our nation faces another Presidential election contest. President Obama is already running and the Republican field is developing it's endless list of candidates de jour as we go forward. One day it's Bachman and the next Palin then it's Perry and now it's Newt, who they'll select is of little interest to me , because whomever it is BOTH candidates essentially answer to the same body of un-elected  Oligarchs who will finance their campaigns and then expect royal re-payment and tacit control of our Gov't. Needless to say I no longer consider most of our Nat'l elections as of much interest. Our Republic and it's democracy are a thing of the past as is our Middle Class society that dominated it. 


A PREDICTION:

Going forward I believe the mold is formed of an increasingly un-equal society in America and many other areas of the planet. A warning here from recent history, this is  an extremely volatile and unstable situation to say the least. Not because of the masses of desperately poor people that will be coming, but because of the ever greedier and power crazed elites that will fight over the  remaining resources available. We just fought three such wars in a row these last 20 yrs. and I predict many more in the near future. As the planet heats up WATER is the next OIL that the elites will come to blows over. The FLASH pts. as always the Middle East and ASIA.

Friday, December 23, 2011

SCIENCE FRI: - SOLAR PAINT !

Paint-On Solar Cells Developed

ScienceDaily (Dec. 21, 2011) — Imagine if the next coat of paint you put on the outside of your home generates electricity from light -- electricity that can be used to power the appliances and equipment on the inside.
A team of researchers at the University of Notre Dame has made a major advance toward this vision by creating an inexpensive "solar paint" that uses semiconducting nanoparticles to produce energy.
"We want to do something transformative, to move beyond current silicon-based solar technology," says Prashant Kamat, John A. Zahm Professor of Science in Chemistry and Biochemistry and an investigator in Notre Dame's Center for Nano Science and Technology (NDnano), who leads the research.
"By incorporating power-producing nanoparticles, called quantum dots, into a spreadable compound, we've made a one-coat solar paint that can be applied to any conductive surface without special equipment."
The team's search for the new material, described in the journalACS Nano, centered on nano-sized particles of titanium dioxide, which were coated with either cadmium sulfide or cadmium selenide. The particles were then suspended in a water-alcohol mixture to create a paste.
When the paste was brushed onto a transparent conducting material and exposed to light, it created electricity.
"The best light-to-energy conversion efficiency we've reached so far is 1 percent, which is well behind the usual 10 to 15 percent efficiency of commercial silicon solar cells," explains Kamat.
"But this paint can be made cheaply and in large quantities. If we can improve the efficiency somewhat, we may be able to make a real difference in meeting energy needs in the future."
"That's why we've christened the new paint, Sun-Believable," he adds.
Kamat and his team also plan to study ways to improve the stability of the new material.
NDnano is one of the leading nanotechnology centers in the world. Its mission is to study and manipulate the properties of materials and devices, as well as their interfaces with living systems, at the nano-scale.
This research was funded by the Department of Energy's Office of Basic Energy Sciences.

25% OF RETAIL IS GONE AS THE 2ND GREAT DEPRESSION GOES ON!

At Mall Of Big Dreams, Few Shoppers


First Posted: 12/23/11 09:35 AM ET Updated: 12/23/11 10:45 AM ET


PATERSON, N.J. -- On a Saturday in mid-December, one of the busiest shopping days of the year in a nation famous for insatiable consumption, the Center City mall was strangely tranquil.
Mohammed Shakeel, age 43, sat behind the counter of Kids Corner Toys, haggling with a customer. He agreed to drop the price of a Mickey Mouse bookbag from $15 to $10, but the would-be buyer walked away.
"There is no purchasing power," Shakeel sighed, as another potential sale evaporated. "Today should be busy. It's just like any other Saturday."
Despite a jolly Santa Claus, audible carols and hanging wreaths, one big holiday tradition was missing at Center City -- shopping. Kids Corner Toys has seen its business dip by about one-fifth this year, according to Shakeel. A half hour drive away at the luxurious Mall at Short Hills, the parking lots were packed as shoppers poured in to visit Miu Miu, Chanel and Neiman Marcus. But in Paterson, New Jersey's third largest city and a community rife with joblessness and economic anxiety, the mall seemed desolate by comparison.
Only a few years ago, in the midst of a national real estate boom, Paterson and myriad other American communities embraced shopping malls and spreads of new condominiums as portals to economic growth, hoping that construction jobs and retail could transcend the post-industrial urban decay that had gripped them for a half-century. Now, with little hope that consumer life will snap back to its pre-recession incarnation anytime soon, the future of such developments is uncertain.
Paterson's Center City mall -- first proposed in flush 2003, and completed in the fall of 2008 -- is a relic of another economic era, one that promised all but the poorest Americans rights to home ownership, credit cards and jobs. Today these rights have been effectively revoked. Yet the mall remains.
What happens when you bet the future on retail and shopping money dries up? Paterson offers some answers. Homeless people take over some of the massage chairs. Alternative retailers with a local flavor pop up in storefronts that are cheap and easy to procure. The busiest days at the cash register tend to coincide with when the state hands out public assistance. Window-shopping replaces the real version, as the mall becomes a community gathering place more than a center of consumption.
That fact that the mall does remain -- and is currently 75 percent occupied -- is a feat largely credited to Efstathios "Steve" Valiotis, the largest landowner in Paterson and one of the wealthiest Greeks in America. Valiotis, 64, has invested more than $200 million to revive the city's dilapidated historic district, a hauntingly beautiful reminder of Paterson's past as the center of American silk production. One hundred thirty million dollars was spent transforming what used to be an empty parking lot across from the courthouse into Center City, according to Ekaterina Valiotis, his daughter and the mall's general manager.
The mall was to be the "new life of Paterson," declared Valiotis' partner, Nick Tsapatsaris. "The industrial Paterson is gone," he told the New Jersey Herald in 2007. "This is the future economy: retail, entertainment, service jobs."
But when the mall opened the following year, the world was gripped by the prospect of synchronized financial meltdown. Brand names like Lehman Brothers and Merrill Lynch eclipsed those of Best Buy and Bed, Bath & Beyond. The doors opened for a "soft opening" smack in the middle of the weakest holiday shopping season in recent history.
An immigrant from Vordonia, Greece, Valiotis and his family frequently attest to an enduring belief in Paterson, despite the challenges. They are optimistic about the mall's future.
"It's like our second home base," said Ekaterina Valiotis, 25. "You come here for business and then you fall in love with it. We're here to stay."
In many ways, the Valiotis family epitomizes the American Dream, to which many Paterson residents -- 30 percent of them immigrants themselves -- also aspire. But the recession has done much to quell hopes of economic mobility. Though New Jersey remains one of the wealthiest states overall, with the fourth-highest household income in the country, cities like Paterson, Camden and Passaic tell a different story.
In Paterson, food stamp usage has risen disproportionately in the past year compared with other parts of the state. Unemployment peaked at 18.3 percent in January 2010, up from around 10 percent in 2008. Over 26 percent of residents live in poverty, compared to 8.8 percent state-wide, according to the most recent U.S. Census data.
Sam Yilmaz, 50, who immigrated to the U.S. from Turkey, has also done well for himself. He owns several businesses in the area, including the Citi Casuals clothing store in Center City. But business has been so bad since 2008 that he is considering returning to his home country next year if sales at his Paterson and Secaucus, New Jersey locations don't improve.
The business "didn't turn out to be a good idea," he said recently at his store in the mall. "It's slow, like the economy. Even at Christmas everyone is waiting until the last minute to shop. Unless they have to, they don't want to spend any money."
Yilmaz signed a temporary holiday lease at Center City, which he does not plan to renew. His store plans to vacate in January, leaving another pockmark in the skin of the nascent mall.
AN UPHILL BATTLE
Ekaterina Valiotis described Center City as "a baby on formula." Despite its less than stellar occupancy rate -- 75 percent, compared to a 90.6 percent average nationwide -- Valiotis said that the 320,000 square foot property is successful when compared to many other new developments, who either stalled or closed completely in the wake of the recession.
Since Center City opened in 2008 with only one store -- the PSE&G gas and electric payment center -- the two Valiotis and fellow developer Nick Tsapatsaris have wooed national chains like Marshalls, PayHalf, Skechers and AT&T. These chains have actually seen a 20 percent increase in sales this year, Valiotis said.
"It's been an uphill battle," she said. "The good thing that we noticed, the good part of the recession if there's such a thing, is that we explored alternative uses a lot more than we intended to."
The alternatives have featured local ventures that in better days might well have been priced out of prime mall space. At the Center City mall, retail space can be leased for as little as $21 per square foot and as much as $35, as compared to the current $38.81 per square foot nationwide average, according to Reis Inc. data.
While at most major malls, managers spend much of their time courting brand name anchor tenants and then keeping them happy, at Center City, Ekaterina Valiotis expends a lot of effort helping small, local ventures like Shakeel's get established.
"We do a lot of handholding," Ekaterina Valiotis said. "We're a tight knit community. Our office is across the street. We're like family here."
MALL-UNITY
Unlike many more established malls, Center City has lived up to its promise of being a community space as well as a shopping site. Locals relax in massage chairs, play baseball at the "It's a Hit" batting cages, see movies at the Fabian 8 Cinema, play basketball in the arcade and take painting classes at the Center City Galleries. One can easily spend a day in Center City without feeling pressured to shop.
The problem is, many do just that. Retailers, of course, are eager to find ways to convince people to do more than just hang out.
Nicola Nucci, 31, one of the co-founders of Center City Galleries, an art gallery and studio space in the mall, says the mentality of the consumer in Paterson is completely different than in other malls.
"Business is great on the first day of the month when people get their welfare checks," Nucci said. "Otherwise, it's not as shoppy as you might think."
The mall is situated in the city's downtown, giving it a degree of built-in foot traffic, but many of those in the vicinity are struggling just to keep themselves under a roof -- never mind the temptation to amass art. You have "people from the courts, people from social services," Nucci said. "From legal services, homeless people."
With so many people living paycheck to paycheck, the holiday season -- when most retailers plan for a great surge of buying -- provides little pop here.
"People don't plan ahead of time for Christmas here," Nucci said.
Nucci, a painter and interior designer, helped start the gallery two years ago, when her co-founder pitched Steve Valiotis on a shop that would feature works by local artists. She has tapped the colorful mix of passersby as a source of art, recruiting people she meets in the mall to create work. Artists regularly work and hang out in the gallery, visiting with shoppers and explaining the concept.
Earlier this year, Nucci found a hit with "Tina Babies" -- homemade stuffed animals dressed in infant clothing crafted by a woman named Tina, who was then pregnant and living in a homeless shelter. She sold enough of her work to be able to move into her own apartment.
Other work by the gallery's 72 artists is highly skilled, but all artists tend to be both from the area and strangers to the art world, said Nucci. Work is priced to the Paterson market -- $22 for an aluminum cross sculpture, $60 for a painting, for example.
Asked whether the gallery was making money, Nucci responded: "We're still here!"
Finances aside, Nucci described Paterson's biggest challenge as its bad reputation as a place of poverty and crime. Profitable or not, she thinks the shopping center is a step in the right direction.
"Things were much worse before the mall," she said.
A LIGHT IN THE BLACK HOLE
Ekaterina Valiotis, the mall's manager, said she hopes Center City will be filled in the next 16 to 18 months, noting that chain retailers are beginning to explore new urban markets all over the U.S.
But even if occupancy rate increases and rents rise, Valiotis asserted that the identity of the mall has been permanently colored by the circumstances of its launching: She plans to maintain the community focus, and the tight relationship with local businesses like Nucci's.
"We've been really embraced by our local community because we opened in times when stores were closing," she said. "We couldn't have left the center of downtown as a construction zone."
"The mall," she added, "is a huge light in the black hole of an economy."
But others question whether expanded retail was ever a wise development path for a community that has been chronically short of jobs ever since manufacturing work began drying up decades ago. The community needs affordable housing and decent paychecks, not Starbucks and Macy's, in this view.
Michael Sherman, 49, a Center City Galleries artist and area native, wonders how a mall filled with chain stores could serve Paterson residents, who, like him, live on the margins.
"I'm on welfare," he said. "I don't have any money. I'm totally desperate. I'm in the process of getting evicted from my house and potentially losing all my paintings."
"Who does a mall or condos really serve?" he asked. "Does it improve the situation for Paterson residents?"
On the second to last Saturday before Christmas, Center City was busier than it had been the week earlier, as expected. Even people with limited spending power were using what cash they had to celebrate the holiday.
Ekaterina Valiotis taught a free art class for kids in one of the vacant spaces.
Michael Sherman waited for customers at his portraiture stand in Center City Galleries.
The Gumball Gallery, a new "urban lifestyle boutique" selling clothes and sneakers, had opened in the past week. "Seeking sales associate," a sign read.
So far, the mall has created around 250 jobs, not including construction positions, according to Valiotis. While this is perhaps less than was once expected, the positions are a godsend in the wake of recent employment news in Paterson: 125 police officers laid off in an attempt to allay what was a $70 million municipal budget shortage earlier this year.
On Saturday, Shantel Lisboa, 23, was shopping for Christmas gifts. She was also looking for a job. After moving to Paterson from Sussex County, N.J., this fall, the Passaic County Community College student has been applying to retail positions around the area, hoping that stores would be seeking holiday workers.
Two weeks prior, she came to Center City, but found no openings. Lisboa applied instead to the Hollister Co. store in nearby Willowbrook, a suburban mall that would require a bus commute. She's waiting to hear back about her interview.
Still, a lack of spending money didn't stop Lisboa from coming out to Center City to check out the perfume store, Aroma Mia.
"It's great to have a mall nearby," she said. "I just wish they would put more stores in it."